rich_jacko: (Union Jack)
rich_jacko ([personal profile] rich_jacko) wrote2012-02-24 03:28 pm
Entry tags:

State of the Union

Is it just me, or are politicians on all sides going about this Scottish referendum business completely backwards?

What they should be doing is holding a UK-wide referendum on whether we should have a federal UK, with equal levels of tax and spending powers devolved to each of England / Scotland / Wales / Northern Ireland, and other things (e.g. foreign policy) remaining central. If, after that, the Scottish Government wanted to hold a separate independence referendum, they could do so with the Scots voting in full knowledge of what was on offer if they stay part of the UK.

Or is that too sensible?

For what it's worth, I'm rather fond of Scotland and would be sad if it became a foreign country. But I think it's right that if the UK stays together, it does so by choice.

[identity profile] grok-mctanys.livejournal.com 2012-02-27 06:16 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, OK. I mostly picked "foreign policy" as you'd used that in your original article, and I didn't recall them having one off the top of my head. I imagine there is some other part of central government that would be required for an effective federation, but which the EU does not currently implement.

As for the centralisation/devolution dichotomy, I think Bruce Schneier's article criticising the creation of the US DHS has a recommendation that sounds like the direction I currently think governments should be headed - centralise co-ordination as globally as possible; distribute responsibility and implementation as locally as possible.