rich_jacko: (Rey & BB-8 by Brian Kesinger)
After London, I mused about trying for a sub-3h45m in 2023 for marathon #3. That was the goal this weekend, as I headed to Leeds for the inaugural Rob Burrow marathon.

I travelled up the day beforehand, mid-afternoon because of rail strikes. I checked into my hotel and walked the route to the start line, so I'd know where I was going the next day. Then it was dinner, a bit of Eurovision and an early night so I'd be fresh in the morning.

When I arrived, the start was a shambles, no other word for it. Nearly an hour-long queue for the bag drop, plus queuing for the loos. Inevitably, they had to delay the start. My wave was already moving by the time I entered the start zone. In a way, this was quite good; it meant there was none of the interminable wait you often get, standing around waiting for the race to start. Fortunately, out on the course itself, everything was a lot better organised, once we got going.

Normal strategy for a marathon is to find your "I can do this all day" pace, and keep going (until you can't!). That was never going to work with this course, which was far more undulating than most. There was also the blazing sun to consider as well as 12,000+ other runners on what were, at times, quite narrow roads. I was continuously having to adjust to my surroundings, easing on the uphills, making gravity work for me on the downhills, weaving into shade where I could and picking my way through the pack.

The first four miles took us through the city centre. There I passed Rob Burrow and Kevin Sinfield, and managed to meet up with Hannah and run with her for a bit. Then it was out into country roads and beautiful views (and hills). Here my right calf threatened to play up (as it has occasionally during training), but I eased on it a bit and it behaved itself. Miles 12 and 13 were an out-and-back stretch, with runners on both sides of the road. Here I could see how far the 3h45m pacer was ahead of me (I wasn't too worried; I crossed the start line 9 minutes after the gun!) and I waved hi to Hannah (who had caught the 4h pacer) again as I was heading back.

Mile 17 was the town of Otley, where Lesley was among the crowd cheering runners on. I didn't manage to see her, but it's not surprising as every inch of pavement through the town was full. The support all the way round the marathon was some of the best I've experienced, but Otley was second to none. They were brilliant and I told them so as I passed through. Though I didn't see Lesley, she was with me in spirit, as I used her patented jelly babies and cocktail sausages snacking strategy to keep me fuelled throughout the race!

Miles 18 and 19 were The Hill We'd All Been Warned About and... actually, it wasn't that bad. The gradient was gentle and even, and it would've been nothing if we hadn't already run 18 miles beforehand! I allowed myself to feel smug about training in Sheffield, as runners all around me started walking as I kept running (albeit at a slower pace). Once I reached the top I was tired, but dared to start thinking about that elusive 3h45m goal...

Too soon. There was a sneaky extra hill at mile 22 that I hadn't expected! I allowed myself a 2 1/2 minute walking break, then forced myself to keep going. I needed that, and it gave me just enough to keep running to the end. The last 10k was pretty much all downhill, and I just needed to keep going. I was metaphorically running on fumes by this point, so it was going to be close. Headingley Stadium was a welcome sight; I wasn't quite sure how much there was left as the route circled around it, but then it was into the ground and across the pitch to the finish line.

I was already in tears before I crossed the line, and exhausted but triumphant. I'd done it with 2 minutes to spare! I collected my medal, soaked up the crowd for a moment, then staggered outside to watch the other finishers coming in. I saw Hannah, followed shortly by Kevin and Rob, so went back into the ground to enjoy the roar as they crossed the line. Hannah and I met up again, congratulated each other over cans of Erdinger, struggled to move again, then endured the equally shambolic saga of reclaiming our bags. Honestly, if I'd have known, I wouldn't have bothered bringing one!

All marathons are tough, but this one seemed to be especially so. Most of the way round and at the end, there were runners dropping out and needing medical attention - a reminder that this is serious business. The first finisher was a relatively slow 2h29m, which makes me even more pleased with my new PB. I think I managed my race about as well as I could've done. (You can judge for yourself on that Strava.) And actually, I quite liked the hills...

I stayed in Leeds overnight, chatted to several other runners in my hotel, slept, ate and recovered slightly. Then it was back home today. Thanks to all those who supported me in raising money for The Pain Relief Foundation. I was in pain after the race, but for 1 in 7 people, it's a constant struggle. If you still want to sponsor me, you can!

Me with my finishing medal Me and Hannah at Headingley Official finishing certificate
rich_jacko: (steampunk)
2020 was hell. 2021 was the year life began returning to normal. 2022 was a full year free from Covid restrictions, and therefore a year for seizing opportunities. Never take freedoms for granted. Unfortunately, the same is not true for everyone. Whether it's China's ongoing Covid mismanagement, or people closer to home restricting their activities by choice, many seem to be stuck in a perpetual 2020 and I worry how it will ever end for them.

Globally, the rest of the news hasn't been great either. Russia's invasion of Ukraine has dominated the global agenda, climate change is hitting home in ever more frightening ways (including disastrous floods in Pakisatan and an unprecedented 40°C heatwave here in the UK), and economies are in a mess for multiple reasons. Women's rights took a (possible) step forwards in Iran with mass protests following the death of Mahsa Amini, and steps backwards in Afghanistan with the Taliban increasingly restricting basic rights, and in the USA with the overturning of Roe v Wade.

Here in the UK, we saw the end of an era with the death of our longest reigning monarch, as well as political turmoil with our shortest serving prime minister, not to mention double-digit inflation, multiple strikes and the pitfalls of Brexit finally coming home. But it wasn't all bad news - football finally came home as well, with the women's Euro 2022 victory. Sam Ryder almost brought Eurovision home, the Platinum Jubilee was a success, Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe was released, and Boris resigned.

Personally, there were a lot of highlights for me this year - including two seaside holidays with groups of friends, going to two weddings, and (of course) travelling up and down the country as I achieved 10 running medals and a whole host of PBs. Less headline-grabbing, but still noteworthy, were several times meeting up with distant family and friends, hikes in the peaks and a lot of parkrun tourism.

I've yet to start thinking much about 2023. I hope family members with health problems have a better time of it. I'll have a marathon to run, but I'm not planning to enter quite so many running events as this year. I'd like to go abroad at some point (It's been a while!). Beyond that, who knows? I should start planning...

Happy New Year! May good fortune smile on you in 2023! :o)
rich_jacko: (Union Jack)
The death of HM Queen Elizabeth II is an event we've known was coming for some time. She was 96, in frail health and increasingly stepping back from public life. Her Platinum Jubilee celebrations this summer felt at the time like a goodbye party. She lived a long and amazing life, and died in her favourite place, surrounded by her family. I suppose that's all any of us could wish for, but it doesn't make it any less sad. It also marks the end of an era. It's strange to be working on Operation London Bridge, stranger still to refer to the reign of Elizabeth II in the past tense and to King Charles III.

"Her Maj" has been such a constant presence in British life, from royal visits to national occasions to speaking to us every Christmas Day, not to mention her likeness on our coins, notes and stamps. She gave a literal lifetime of service to our country and the Commonwealth (which, in many ways, stands as her greatest achievement), working right up until the very end, when she saw in her fifteenth UK Prime Minister. She was our strongest diplomat, a Head of State with a wealth of knowledge and experience, removed from the divisiveness of electoral politics. She was patron of more than 600 charities and organisations, and famous for taking an interest in everyone she met. She always seemed to be there, with her devotion to duty, her warm words of wisdom, and her infectious smile and good humour. She was a role model and an inspiration to millions. People are affectionately referring to her as "the nation's granny", and it does feel like that in a way. Even though the vast majority of us never knew her personally, it kind of feels as if we did.

As I mentioned when Prince Philip passed away last year, I was lucky enough to see him and the Queen in person, when they came to Leeds on her Diamond Jubilee tour. I took the photos below on that day. It was a lovely occasion, with a great sense of community from everyone there.



Of course, not everyone agrees. I have a theory that your views on the monarchy depends on whether you see us belonging to it, or it belonging to us. A minority think of the royals as over-privileged, swanning around at taxpayers' expense, and all the pomp and ceremony as self-indulgent and divorced from reality. Others (like me, obviously) think of the words used to describe the Queen (and being pledged by our new King) - duty, service, humility - and see the pomp and ceremony as an integral part of our culture and national life, there for all of us to appreciate or participate in. Even if each group can understand, intellectually, where the other is coming from, I fear that's a gulf in emotional perspective that's too large to bridge. Which is a real shame, as I get the sense the Queen felt duty-bound to each and every one of us.

Some feel the blanket coverage of current events is excessive. I do get that. I'd be lying if I said I'd never felt the same way about certain sporting tournaments or other events. But personally, while I've hardly been watching it all, I've drawn comfort from being able to switch the telly on at any time and see what is happening. I expected to feel sad at the Queen's death (and I was), but I was surprised at how reassuring I found it seeing Charles ascend to the throne. But I suppose that sense of continuity and resilience in the face of national adversity is one of the things the monarchy is all about. It's clearly impossible for him to fill the shoes left by a sovereign who is already starting to be called "Elizabeth the Great", but his first address to the nation as King was perfectly judged, even as he was mourning the loss of his mother. I wish him well.

For the public, we are all dealing with this in our own way. I am not travelling to London to join The Queue to see her lying in state, but I am full of admiration for those who are willing to wait in line for five miles and 24 hours to do so. Could there be any more magnificent, quintessentially British tribute? For me, I was glad to join (in person) the brief service, minute's silence and national anthem at the start of the Great North Run last weekend, to sign a book of condolence at the town hall, and to watch some of the key events on television. These have all helped me to mentally process a peculiar mix of grief for a stranger's death, a sense of living through a moment of national history, and a collective experience in which there are so many differing views and individual stories.

I think all that remains for me to say is thank you, Ma'am. Rest in peace, now your duty is done. We were so very lucky to have had you as our Queen. x
rich_jacko: (Herd of Sheffield - Small Beginnings)
It's perhaps tempting fate, with a relatively unknown new covid variant now circulating, but I want to record how good it feels, now that social and entertainment events have been starting to get back to normal.

Friday pub socials are now happening two or more times a month, and we're getting a pretty good turnout. It's great to be able to relax and spend time with each other over drinks once again.

Just over a month ago, I went to see Tim Peake talk about his career at City Hall. Much of it was things I already new, but some of it was fresh (I'd never previously thought about the difficulty of getting to sleep in zero-g!), and there's nothing like the personal touch of having Major Tim talk through it all in person. It was basically the best PowerPoint presentation ever!

November saw two big birthday parties on consecutive weekends, for Cis and Liz's 50ths. I only paid a brief visit to Cis's, at Trippets Lounge Bar, but it was great to see so many people there and catch up with faces I'd not seen in a long while. Liz's do, at Walkley Community Centre, naturally featured an enormous buffet, as well as party games and dancing into the night (well, 11pm). I had a wonderful time.

Kids and bigger kids playing pass the parcel Liz blows out the candles Auntie Carey came equipped with party glasses as usual!

A week later, I went with Gillian down to Telford for Wales Comic Con. I'd never have spotted this was on if Gillian hadn't mentioned it to me, and I'm glad she did. We went to a Q&A talk with Doctors 5 through 8, and racked up a few autographs and photo shoots between us. There were a lot of cosplayers to admire too (We were ticking off Doctors). It was a good day out and fairly, if not entirely, successful - The organisation of the event left a lot to be desired and we had a long delay on the trains back. You can read Gillian's post here.

Q&A with the four Doctors Gillian with Dennis Lawson James Masters and me, auditioning for a buddy detective show

On Monday this week, I was back at City Hall for another space-themed show, this time Return of the Jedi in Concert - the film, up on a cinema screen, accompanied by a 70-piece live orchestra. It sounded fantastic, though at times I had to remind myself to pay attention to the live music, not just get lost in the film!

Return of the Jedi in Concert

This coming weekend will also see my final running event of the year, the Percy Pud 10k. This one is a bit of a Sheffield institution. I've never entered it before. The course is through familiar territory, but it'll be a different experience running it as part of a big event, with celebrations (and Christmas puds!) at the finish.

Looking further ahead, I remain hopeful for a much more fun festive season than last year.
rich_jacko: (Avatar)
I went onwards to London last Saturday for charity run number 3, the world's biggest marathon.

I expected registration on Saturday to be stressful, and it was. Unlike other events, where your bib number is posted to you beforehand, for this one they posted out kitbags. You then had to drop these off at the ExCeL Centre, choose your finishing t-shirt, register and collect your number. Supposedly this was for covid reasons, to reduce the crowding of thousands of people together on race day. If so, it was a miserable failure. All it did was move the crowd indoors and a day earlier. Social distancing was impossible; you just had to trust a combination of luck, vaccinations and the requirement for everyone to have a negative lateral flow test in the two days beforehand. I suspect the real reason for this bizarre set-up was to influence people to buy stuff at the ExCeL's marathon show. I didn't go to the show. I was sufficiently freaked out, by the crowds on the Tube and while waiting in various queues for an hour, that I just wanted to get out as soon as possible.

After that, it was back to my hotel in Canary Wharf, where I'd literally only had time to check in, drop my bags and go, for a more chilled evening and an early night before the big race. The 18-mile marker was just outside the entrance, giving a taste of things to come. The weather was absolutely chucking it down, thankfully not giving a taste of things to come.

I woke as dawn was breaking on a crisp, dry and chilly morning - near perfect running conditions again (I've been so lucky with the weather across all three events!). After a sensible, carb-oriented breakfast (must resist having lots of bacon and sausages...), I hopped onto the DLR to Greenwich and made my way through the park to the start line. I was in the green starting zone, which was the smallest of the three, and had less of the excitement than the red zone, where all the TV cameras were. It was cold, waiting to begin, and I was glad I'd brought a foil blanket with me. It was nice to chat with other runners during the long, last-minute queue for the loos and while waiting in our holding area. I spoke with those hoping to go sub-3h30m, those doing their first or fifth marathon, and found myself stood behind the start line next to six people about to break a world record, dressed as Colin the Caterpillar. I love the dichotomy between all the different stories and challenges people have set themselves, and the way running events are such a communal, shared experience. Mind you, everyone in our holding area exclaimed, "What!?" at the guy being interviewed on the big screen for running 48 marathons in 30 days. That's just ridiculous!


As with the Great North Run, the wave starts and absence of spectators at the start line meant it didn't feel like a huge moment. I was mostly just eager to get going (and get warmed up!). It was fairly big though, being called forward with 1,000 other participants, hearing the airhorn, then all crossing the line in our three-minute window. The mass start times were spread over two hours, rather than six, as they had been in Newcastle, making for a much busier start. For all the chaos of Saturday, the organisation on the day itself was faultless, so full credit and thanks to all the organisers and volunteers (who, of course, I thanked along the way). Marshalling the runners, helping people cross the roads around us, manning the drinks and energy stations - all of these were vital jobs. Even if the road around the Lucozade hand-outs did feel rather too much like trying to run on the floor of the Roxy disco.

The early part of the run was all about not charging off too quickly and finding a comfortable pace. Easy enough, though it was tempting to go speeding ahead during the downhill mile 3. Greenwich, for the most part, looks like a residential part of any major city - normal roads, lined with houses, shops and the occasional park. It was easy to forget this was the London Marathon. Also, the 12-year-old me enjoyed sniggering at the marshalls stood either side of every speed bump, shouting "Hump!" enthusiastically and repeatedly as a warning.

As we merged with the red zone starters at the end of mile 3, the numbers grew and it began to feel more like a major event (I couldn't resist shouting, "Come on, you reds!" when they first emerged on the other side of the carriageway, divided from us "greens" and "blues" for a short stretch by the barrier). Then, just past the 10k mark, came the first iconic London Marathon moment - the tight loop around three sides of the Cutty Sark. The crowds here were enormous and gave everyone great support. If you want to know why mass running events are addictive, think about having thousands of people lining the streets, cheering you on. It was like that all the way around (easily the equal of the Great North Run), but nowhere moreso than there at the Cutty.


Almost as if it's the world's biggest parkrun, a marathon is mostly "a run, not a race". The camaraderie and support all the runners give to each other is fantastic. It may be different for the very elite, but us mass runners are mainly focussed on our own run, rather than jostling for position. Every one of us know how much training needs to go into running this distance and have enormous respect for one another. Especially so for those taking on the extra challenge of running in fancy dress. Those runners attract more attention from the crowds, but you can't begrudge them any of it - it's hard enough running 26.2 miles in clothes designed for running in; doing it in a bulky, hot and heavy costume isn't something I'd want to do. As well as the aforementioned Colin, along the way I saw a rhino, an elephant, a stormtrooper with a feather boa, a tractor, a bride and groom pairing, a three-legged pairing, Spider-Man, Batgirl and a giant brain. You cheer them all on, just as much as the crowds do. As I and a couple of other runners passed a guy clomping along in full ski boots. As one, we did a double-take and complimented him, "Well done, mate!" As the event's tagline says, #WeRunTogether.

Beyond the Cutty, the next few miles were uneventful and I got properly set into my rhythm. This wasn't a run I needed to think particularly hard about. There weren't the constant undulations of the Great North Run, or the massive uphill slog of the Sheffield Half. This was mostly flat all the way. It was just a case of finding a comfortable pace I felt I could keep up forever (the distance is too far to be thinking "Well, I can push for this long before I start to tire) and making sure I broadly stuck to it. This was quite easy given the number of other runners to pace against, and I found myself slipping into something of a zen-like state. Beyond that, the sum total of my strategy involved regular sips of water and energy bars after 15k and 30k. A shorter run, such as a 5k or 10k is all about speed and managing your heart rate/breathing; a marathon is all about going the distance and managing your energy/hydration levels and your legs. Every mile and every kilometre of the course was marked out (most events mark out either one or the other), which provided plenty of markers to reassure us all we were making continuous progress. I kept reminding myself, £17 per km - that's how much money I was raising for charity, and it seemed like a pretty good deal. I was definitely achieving something here. Thank you once again to everyone who has sponsored me over these events.

The biggest progress marker of all was Tower Bridge. I knew it was coming up, from passing the 12-mile marker, but it was still quite something to turn the corner and see the road stretching up to it. It was the only really noticeable uphill on the entire course, but the sight of the bridge gives you such a boost, you don't care. The crowds were in full force here too, and running across such a landmark was just as iconic a sporting moment as crossing the Tyne Bridge had been in Newcastle. In London, the bridge has the added significance of meaning you're nearly at the halfway point. This was one of the most exciting bits of the course - in quick succession, you run over the bridge, past the Tower of London, join a mile-and-a-half stretch of watching elite runners passing in the other direction (the fast club athletes, by the time I got there; the Olympians were long gone!), and hit the halfway point.


After that, it was into the winding slog around Canary Wharf and the Isle of Dogs. Not that it was terrible, but this was definitely the least fun part of the course. You lose track of where you are, it goes on for seven miles before you rejoin the carriageway in the other direction, and this is the point in the run when you're starting to seriously tire. And I had to run past my hotel, knowing I still had eight miles to go until the finish line. This whole section was not helped by (a) the sun starting to beat down hard - thank heaven for the shade from tall buildings; or (b) my Garmin watch losing GPS position - curse you, shade from tall buildings! The resulting garbage pace information (16min/km one minute; 3min/km the next - Go home, Garmin; you're drunk!) made it harder to concentrate and stick to my pace. But I got through that long section, and the 32k marker was another significant psychological boost - just over 10k to go and, unlike my previous marathon two years earlier, I was still going strong at this point. Don't get me wrong. It was hard work, I was tired and ready for it to be over soon, but I was still running well. I hadn't had to stop or walk so far and it was around this point I set myself the target of keeping that going until the finish line.

At 37k, I passed that all-important "only a parkrun to go" moment and entered very familiar London territory. There wasn't just an arbitrary distance to the finish line any more; it was a route I knew well. (Well, perhaps not running through Blackfriars Tunnel, but generally.) This was the first and last moment during the run that I had a serious think about my finishing time. Having established I wasn't going to break sub-3h45m (a possible goal I had going in), but nor was I going to be slower than 4h, unless anything went badly wrong in the last stretch, I dismissed such thoughts again and just concentrated on making it to the end without breaking stride. Others were slowing around me at this point. I tried to encourage them along where I could, but I was too tired to shout very much.


Along the Embankment, past the 25-mile marker - I could feel the end was near as I passed the corner of Westminster Bridge and Big Ben, 1,200m to go... Up past Whitehall, along Birdcage Walk and alongside St James's Park - it's just name-dropping landmarks at this point. This was it, the third and final big iconic section (after Cutty Sark and Tower Bridge) leading up to the finish. The signs marked 600m to go... 400m to go... I rounded the corner past Buckingham Palace (noting the Union Jack flying; Her Maj wasn't in!) and saw the finish up ahead. I got a boost from hearing the announcer talking about everyone coming in now achieving a finish in under 4 hours. It was in the bag at this point and I didn't have the energy for a sprint finish. Along with a couple of others, I spread my arms wide, soaked up the atmosphere and let myself relax a little, just enjoying cruising the final straight up The Mall and across the line. A finish time of 3h52m26s. I'll happily take that.


I paused for a selfie (getting out of the way of a runner dressed as a tree, who was doing the same), collected my kit bag, then went to join the park full of runners collapsed on the ground, to rest my weary legs, have a snack and a drink, and catch up on messages - lots of good luck messages from friends and family, as well as congratulations from those who'd been following my progress online. In my goody bag, as well as the extra layer and food items I'd added, there were much-needed bottles of Lucozade and water, a hefty finisher's medal and the brightest finisher's t-shirt I've ever earned. It'll certainly be handy if I go jogging at night and need to be seen... from orbiting satellites.

Eventually I struggled back to my feet. This was hard. I gave the corporate stalls a miss, but cheered on the people who were still running as I made my way back to the Tube. Having been lucky with the weather so far, the heavens now opened for a brief deluge. I got wet, but mainly felt sorry for those still out on the course. It felt nice to be treated like royalty by the Underground staff - a finisher's medal got you a "Well done!" and free passage through the barriers. Random passers-by also paused to congratulate anyone wearing a medal. There were still runners passing by my hotel when I got back, and the sun was out again, so I stopped to cheer them on before retiring to my room. The remainder of the day saw me attending to my aching body, phoning Mum and Dad, taking advantage of the hotel pool and sauna (Bliss!) and staggering out as far as Nando's for food replenishment. After which I went to bed at quarter to nine and slept for ten hours.

I felt stiff and sore on Monday morning, but triumphant. I made further use of the pool and sauna, and was able to make full use of the breakfast offer, without having to worry about running. There were several other runners staying in the hotel, so lots of mutual congratulations and swapping notes on how we'd done (a near clone of Dave R had run it in under 3h30m). I checked out, popped briefly into our London office to pick up my new security pass for work (None of my colleagues was in) then joined the queue for medal engraving outside the New Balance shop on Oxford Street.

I was expecting to have to wait, but I spent almost as long waiting as it took to run the marathon. I'm not even exaggerating; I was stood in line for about 3h45m. Not what your legs need the day after running 26.2 miles. Luckily it was a fine day and I had a book to read (thank you, Stephen Fry!) but still, had I known it would take that long, I probably wouldn't have bothered. The people doing the engraving were lovely and friendly, but there really needed to have been more than two of them. Negative marks for post-event organisation, just as with the pre-event arrangements. As a result, I missed the last super off peak train back by about 20 minutes, and spent 3 hours waiting around Kings Cross - St Pancras. I bought books, beer and pasta to pass the time, and eventually made it home around a quarter to ten. I was very glad I'd booked the following day off work as well.

Despite such occasional setbacks, it had been a triumphant trip. And let's not forget I wasn't just doing this for the challenge, but to raise funds for the National Autistic Society. My sponsorship page remains open for anyone who still wants to donate - I know some people have qualms about donating until after the event ;o)


What next? London has given me greater confidence in running marathons, so I doubt it will be my last. At York, I started too fast, hit "the wall" around 30k and half-limped to the end. I made none of those mistakes this time around and kept running throughout, at a satisfyingly consistent pace. Yet my finish time was around 2 minutes slower than York. Did I err the other way, and pace myself too cautiously? I feel I've got a sub-3h45m in me; I only need to shave off 11s/km. Not next year though, as I want a break from marathon training over the summer. Maybe in 2023...
rich_jacko: (Herd of Sheffield - Small Beginnings)
Yesterday was the second event of my charity fundraising triple, the delayed 2020 Sheffield Half Marathon. (Look out for me crossing the start line at the very end of the video at that link!)

This was logistically the easiest of the three, being my local event, so no need for an overnight stay - just a 5k warm-up jog from home to the start line in the city centre! Running-wise, though, it's by far the steepest of them, with a ridiculous uphill climb for the first six miles. I've got the measure of it now, having run this event twice before, but there were several points I thought to myself, "Why am I doing this again?" Then I got to mile 7, with its stunning views from the top of Ringinglow, and massively enjoyable downhill sweep back into town, and I remembered, "Oh yes, this is why!"

I was maintaining pace with several other runners around me, including the 1h45m pacers, for much of the race. It was interesting chatting with those who'd run the course before and knew what to expect, versus those who hadn't, though everyone did really well and I hardly saw anyone give up and walk up the hill. I noted smugly to myself the points where I'd had to walk the first time I ran this event, and was pleased with my running progress that I no longer need to.

As an event, this was far smaller than the Great North Run, of course - a mere 3,792 runners, rather than 57,000. The crowds weren't quite out in the same force, with lots of gaps along the way but, where they were gathered, they made plenty of noise and gave lots of encouragement. One feature I really liked was that the finish line commentator obviously had access to all the chip data as runners neared the finish, and called out every single name for the crowd to cheer us across the line. That was a lovely touch that I haven't seen at any other running event.

I'd dampened down expectations of another fast time, being aware of the hill, needing to save myself for London, and because of how muggy the weather had been. As it happened, there was a nice breeze for the second half of the race and I'd forgotten how much fun the last few miles can be. I'd have been happy with sub-1h50m but, in the end, I finished in just 1h40m32s - only 2 minutes slower than my GNR time and a new PB for the course.

26.2 miles of my fundraising challenge done; 26.2 miles to go. Now I have less than a week to recover before the big one...

With my medal after the finish
rich_jacko: (Rey & BB-8 by Brian Kesinger)
On Sunday, I took part in the 40th Great North Run. I joined 57,000 runners, including the best in the world. The run was broadcast live in 127 countries and was the first major event of its kind anywhere since the pandemic began. It was a brilliant experience and the most fun I've ever had running a half marathon.

I'm really glad about that, because I turned down a holiday in Wales with friends to run in this event. I'm not going to speculate which I'd have enjoyed more, because that's a really counterproductive way of thinking. But it was a major running achievement which will stay with me. Plus I have (at the time of writing this) raised £1,286 for the National Autistic Society, which counts for a lot.

The event took up pretty much my whole weekend. After parkrun (of course!), I only had a little while to pack before catching the train up to Newcastle. I checked into my hotel, took a walk out to the Town Moor (to be aware of my route to the start line the next morning) and along the Tyne (to admire the bridges), and then there was only time for dinner, watching Emma Raducanu win the US Open (along with half the people in the hotel, it seemed, and trying to get a bit of sleep before the big day.

I didn't sleep much. But I had a good hotel breakfast and made my way to the start in plenty of time. The weather was pretty much perfect - cool and cloudy. I was glad the heatwave had passed! My worries about finding my way past the road closures were unnecessary - I just followed the growing crowd! Social distancing (of sorts) meant there was a rolling start. The race officials called all the orange waves forward together (I was meant to be in orange wave 6 of 8), which meant I ended up starting 20 minutes earlier than I expected to.

The start line itself was a strange non-event. No waiting, no countdown, no crowds, no announcement or airhorns. There was plenty of all that on the way across to the start line, but the start itself saw us all weaving through metal barriers, which seemed like they were put there to trip us up, but were actually a clever way of spacing everyone out. I emerged from that obstacle course and, oh look, I guess we're starting running now!

Once around the first bend, the crowds started lining the roads to cheer everyone on. They didn't stop all the way round. The atmosphere you get from road races like this is something special, and the buzz you get from doing it with thousands of other runners just adds to that feeling. I hadn't realised how much I'd missed it until just then. I've cried at the end of a long run before now, but this was the first time I'd felt myself begin to get teary right at the start. I think I went around the entire route with a big grin on my face.

On runs which aren't the world's biggest half marathon, you get crowds like that at the start and finish, with long stretches in the middle where there aren't many spectators and the runners themselves thin out a little. Not here. The biggest gap in the crowd was maybe 100m or so. There were ordinary people lining the roads, charity stalls (I made sure to look out for and wave to the NAS one at miles 3 and 9), live music and more. The only thing I missed out on was seeing the Red Arrows flying overhead (Going by the TV coverage, I think they must've flown over about when I was at the furthest point of the route.) While it was nowhere near as heaving as the aerial shots I've seen of hordes of runners from previous years (we were generally all running at a socially distanced 2m from each other throughout), there were always lots of other runners surrounding me as well.

One advantage of the altered route this year was getting to see the elite runners on their return leg, as my wave was heading outwards. During my first couple of miles, I saw the elite women coming up to the finish, then shortly after the elite men, and then the other side of the carriageway began to fill up with the mass of other runners like me.

As well as the crowds, runners themselves were cheering each other on, whether it was those passing in the other direction, those in crazy-but-amazing costumes (I spotted Marge Simpson, the Queen of Hearts, Three Little Pigs - who'd been interviewed on the news that morning, Mario & Luigi, a lion, and many more), those running for the same charity, or those who just looked like they needed the encouragement. I joined in of course. We also got to high-five the crowds, do the iconic run across the Tyne Bridge not once but twice, waive at the big screen at the halfway turnaround, and take full advantage of the acoustics as we ran under the motorway overpass ("Oggy! Oggy! Oggy!" "Oi! Oi! Oi!").

I'd resolved not to set myself a target time, and to just enjoy the race at whatever pace felt good. And I pretty much did. I didn't look at my watch at all for the first couple of km. When I did, I found I was averaging about 4:45 per km, which surprised me. I'd typically been doing about 5:10 per km during training runs, but the energy you get from the atmosphere at an event always make you go a bit faster, as does the push you get from having other runners around you. I was going fast - too fast for a very long run, but manageable over a half marathon. I kept an eye on my pace after that, preparing to back off a little if I found myself pushing too hard.

Lots of people (including elite runners) said what a hilly course it was. Pah! These people have clearly never been running in Sheffield! What it was, was undulating pretty much throughout. This brought its own challenges. Your mind is working hard, as well as your body, in an event like this. While I was enjoying the crowd, I was also constantly having to pick my path around other runners; be aware of my pace, energy and any aches or niggles; as well as keep track of taking in sensible amounts of water and sugar. In that state of mind, it was easy not to notice when a downhill slope gently turned into an uphill slope. (Yes, it was so not hilly, I almost didn't notice some of the hills, ha!) When you find yourself still doing a downhill pace on an uphill, you need to ease off!

That's not to say it wasn't hard work. It was. I was putting a lot of effort in, and I've got the stats to prove it! My point is I got caught up in the moment and was enjoying it all the way round (even when it started raining towards the end). Having been training for a full marathon gave me a fitness level and a confidence to stretch myself over a half. It was only towards the finish, once the inclines got steeper and the route wound its way uphill back into the city centre and towards the Town Moor, that I found myself struggling and wanting to slow down.

By this point, though, I'd realised I was on target for achieving a long-term running goal - a sub-100-minute half marathon. So I pushed on. Those last couple of miles were incredibly hard work. My heart rate stats show I was averaging 184 beats per minute at that stage (which is pretty much maximum effort and not sustainable), versus a more sensible 164 beats per minute for the rest of the route, up until that point. I cheered along with everyone around me as I came up to the finish line, crossing it with over 80 seconds to spare! I leapt over the line and punched the air in triumph!

(Then immediately had to dart sharply to the right to avoid the runners in front, who'd come to a dead stop, while I still had forward momentum... Never mind, it didn't ruin the moment too much!)

My time was 1:38:36, over 3 minutes faster than my previous PB. On reflection, I shouldn't have been that surprised. I'd been training for a marathon, had the boost from a mass event and it was the least hilly such mass event I'd done. But I'm still very, very pleased with that result.

It all seemed to be over way too soon (Maybe I should've run slower!). I collected my goody bag, posed for my finishing photo, and made my way over to the NAS charity tent, where snacks and drinks awaited. I spent a while nattering there with the volunteers and other runners (It felt very strange that some had finished, like me, while others were still waiting to be called to the start line). Then I watched a bit of the race from the sidelines on my way back to my hotel, had a quick shower and change, then caught the train back to Sheffield.

One down... two to go. I don't expect to set the same kind of pace for the remaining runs. The Sheffield Half Marathon (as mentioned) is hillier, and I'll be wanting to make sure I don't knacker myself a week before the London Marathon. For that one, I don't feel quite as well prepared for the distance as I did for the Yorkshire Marathon in 2019. My aims are simple - get to the end; don't die!

My legs were sore on Monday, but by Tuesday I was back out there running 6k in preparation for the next event. Wish me luck, and keep the sponsor money coming! :o)

rich_jacko: (Union Jack)
The death of Prince Philip today is a sad moment.

It should hardly come unexpected - after all, he was only two months off his 100th birthday and had recently spent a month in hospital. But it feels somehow like the passing of an age. As a public servant, seeing Operation Forth Bridge launching into action really brought home to me the significance of his passing for our nation. Some parts of the plan have clearly been updated very recently (covid measures); others were just as clearly written a long time ago (guidance on what hats government staff should wear if out on official business during the mourning period).

I was and remain a fan of the Duke - for his pioneering campaigning work as president of the WWF and for his establishing the Duke of Edinburgh award, as much as for his lifetime of public service, modernising the Royal family and being "strength and stay" to HM the Queen for 73 years. Yes, he came out with the occasional inappropriate comment, but there never seemed to be any malice in it and it shouldn't overshadow all the good work he did. The BBC's obituary of him is a very good summary of a remarkable (and at times, contradictory) life in the public eye.

The photos below are taken from the one time I saw the Duke - during the Queen's Diamond Jubilee tour in 2012.
rich_jacko: (Union Jack)
I watched the Meghan and Harry interview last night. I know a lot of people aren't interested, and I'm not completely sure why I am. I guess I'm a bit of a sucker for royal news and all things constitutional. The following are a few reactions I had (expanding on a comment I posted earlier on That Facebook):

My overall impression was one of sadness that they felt the need to drag a family feud out in public. We didn't need to know there was a time Prince Charles wasn't returning Harry's calls, or that Meghan and Kate had a brief falling out over dresses for flower girls (You said you forgave her and would never want to raise it in public, so why are you raising it in public?). They say they want to mend bridges, but airing these things can't possibly help.

The mental health and racism issues were much more serious, and did need to be brought to light. Most of the criticism was aimed at palace officials rather than the royals themselves. It certainly feels like there should be an investigation into this. Again, it was sad that the couple didn't feel they could turn to any of the family for help - especially given the amount of work Prince William in particular has done to raise the profile of mental health issues.

The unnamed royal commenting on what colour Archie's skin would be is a tricky one, where it feels we need to hear the other side. The context was unclear. Was it intended as "the media are going to obsess over this, so you need to be prepared to deal with that," or was it something more sinister?

The institutional lack of support was obvious though. I was also sad about the awful press treatment of certain women in the royal family (and it is always the women), and noted the irony of this being broadcast on International Women's Day. It's probably right that the palace has never got involved in a media tit-for-tat, but it's hard not to imagine something could have been done to challenge the worst of the journalistic behaviour.

Overall, Meghan and Harry mostly came across sympathetically and it was nowhere near as cringe-worthy as that awful 1995 Diana interview, but it was still an exercise in media manipulation and only one side of the story. What they said deserves to be taken seriously, but we shouldn't jump to too many conclusions.

Some of it didn't quite ring true. Removing their security was presented as family pettiness, but that security is taxpayer-funded, so there will have been wider considerations. Archie not being a prince was portrayed as a personal snub, but it reflects a long-term trend of scaling back royal titles and the civil list - William and Kate's children are in the direct line of succession, but none of the Queen's other great-grandchildren have titles, nor do Princess Anne's children.

The bits where the interview was dumbed down for the US audience were annoying, such as Oprah's fake astonishment at the "revelations" the royals can't just do whatever they want, and that the media have a lot of influence over them. Though I do wonder how the anti-royal brigade will square Meghan's description of a restrictive, hard-working and emotionally brutal life with their perception of the royals as a bunch of lazy freeloaders.

There were lighter moments. It was nice to hear how warmly Meghan was welcomed in at first, and I loved the anecdote of how she first met the Queen, wasn't expecting to, and had to be given a hasty lesson in how to curtsey by other royals. They were both full of praise for the Queen. (No one ever has anything bad to say about HMTQ!) Their reflections on parenthood were charming too.

I am still a little baffled though, as to why a couple claiming to try to escape the public eye and protect their son would move to LA, start a media company and name it after him.
rich_jacko: (Harry Potter)
It's been nearly 7 months since I last did one of these. With Cineworld closing again and other cinemas probably not far behind (the Bond film delayed again being the final straw after every other major release was also put back), it could well be another 7 months or more before I do another. But I have enjoyed going back to the cinema, however briefly it lasted.

Proxima - Sarah (Eva Green) is an ESA astronaut preparing for a lengthy space mission. We follow her training, but the emphasis is on her personal relationships with her young daughter and ex-husband as she prepares to leave them behind. A film about enforced separation and quarantine is perhaps a little too close to the bone for 2020, and it tugs at the heartstrings. The training and Sarah's bonding with her fellow astronauts is all handled very realistically, and the multinational characters mean the film switches between English, French, German and Russian constantly, but it's seemless and natural. One selfish act by Sarah near the end is a tad annoying and undermines the realism, but overall this was an absorbing story.

Tenet - Much-hyped as the saviour of this year's cinema, Tenet was... well, it was okay. I say that as a big Christopher Nolan fan, but this was sub-par for him. Don't get me wrong, it was a blast. The timey-wimey weirdness, conspiracy-laden plot and pretty much non-stop action were all blockbuster entertainment as it should be, and so much fun to see on the biggest screen (IMAX) again. But it's lacking in character - we know nothing about our hero (John David Washington), who is credited only as "The Protagonist", and very little about anyone he meets. We care that he's trying to save the world from a mysterious future threat, but not about the characters. Despite the convoluted plot, in some ways it's too predictable. Several times I'd watch a scene and thing, "We're going to see this again later, aren't we? And that thing is going to be done by that person." There's some satisfaction in watching these replays unfold, but I'd like not to have guessed so much. 2020 hat-tip: as a visual aid to tell when a character's travelling back through time, they wear a face mask. Apparently it's dangerous to breathe oxygen travelling the other way through time to you. Of course it is.

Away - This was a rather lovely piece of animation. A teenage boy and a little bird journey across a strange island. He has been planewrecked there, and a giant shadowy figure is slowly pursuing him as he tries to get home. That's it. There's no dialogue, hardly any characters and very little story. Just simple, but eye-catching visuals and watching the journey unfold. It's a short 75 minutes, but an utterly absorbing escape from the world for that time. It was a limited release, but worth tracking down if you can find it.

The New Mutants - Much delayed, the latest X-Men film goes full teen horror movie. Danielle Moonstar (Blu Hunt) is a young mutant only just discovering her powers. After a tornado, she wakes in a hospital run by Dr Reyes (Alice Braga) and populated by other mutants her age - a troubled and sometimes spiky ensemble cast consisting of Maisie Williams, Anna Taylor-Joy, Charlie Heaton and Henry Zaga. Are they in an asylum? A prison? A research facility? Or all three? Before long, things are going bump in the night and all the teens' various unresolved traumas are coming to life around them. Is this a manifestation of their powers, or something worse? If you want an idea of the vibe the filmmakers are going for here, there are moments where our heroes are watching Buffy on telly. It is all very Buffy, but with the horror dialled up several notches. Not a classic, but much better than I expected it to be.

Bill & Ted Face the Music - Dudes! The Wyld Stallyons are back, for more time-travelling chaos, saving the world, saving the princesses, and trying to find the song that wil unite the world. Bill S. Preston, Esq. (Alex Winter) and Ted "Theodore" Logan (Keanu Reeves) are now middle-aged rockers, failing to recreate their brief glory days, but worshipped by their teen daughters, Thea (Samara Weaving) and Billie (Brigette Lundy-Paine), aka "Little Ted" and "Little Bill". The dads haven't grown up at all and the kids are chips off the old blocks. All the survivign cast are back, and there's even a touching tribute to Rufus (George Carlin). It's nostalgic fun. Like its heroes, the film is riffing mainly on past glories, but with just enough new stuff in the mix to keep it fresh and entertaining. It's not going to blow you away, and anyone unfamiliar with the first two installments will probably wonder what the hell they're watching. But it doesn't matter, because it's so upbeat, so full of optimism and joy and people coming together, that you can't help but smile. A most triumphant and much needed antidote to 2020.

David Attenborough: A Life On Our Planet + Q&A with Michael Palin – Sir David Attenborough, national treasure and aged 94, describes this as his "witness statement and vision for the future". It's a more personal and sobering film than most of his work, charting how, over the course of his lifetime, he has seen how humanity has "not just ruined the wilderness; we've destroyed it". Through archive footage counting through the years of his life, on-screen statistics count the rising human population and carbon levels in the atmosphere, and falling proportion of wilderness. Most of this we already know, but nothing brings it home to you quite as much as a documentary like this can. But, as always with Attenborough, there is a glimpse of hope, as he sets out examples of rewilding, intensive sustainable farming, changes in attitudes and more which could yet save us all. For, as the bookending Chenobyl sequence shows, "nature" will survive and thrive in the long term, with or without us. After all the solemnity, the interview with Michael Palin at the end provides a welcome bit of light relief. Everyone should see this film.
rich_jacko: (lego ani)
On Tuesday, I went to one of Cineworld's final showings before they closed. There was an odd feel about the place; it was mostly empty and one poor staff member had the job of continuously wiping down all the handrails.

I was there for an Unlimited exclusive showing of the first episode of The Mandalorian, Disney Plus's flagship show. A showing I might not have gone to if it wasn't for the fact that I'd booked my ticket weeks ago. I was amused to overhear other Unlimited card holders planning how many other films they could squeeze into one night.

The show was... okay, I guess. It was fun, there were some nice set-piece scenes and I really enjoyed many of the secondary characters who 'Mando' meets along his journey. My main problem with it was that I didn't understand why I was meant to care about the central character - an anonymous bounty hunter who barely talks and never takes his helmet off. Maybe the audience gets to know him better as the series goes on, I don't know.

Also, what is it with Disney-made Star Wars that means everywhere looks like Tatooine? I don't just mean in terms of the desert landscapes. I mean the mix of species, the costumes, the buildings, the technology - all of these things varied greatly from planet to planet and culture to culture in George Lucas's galaxy, while still feeling part of the same overall society. Under Disney, every place seems the same.

I would still like to see the rest of the series sometime though. And I'm much more stoked for Clone Wars season 7, which was trailed afterwards...
rich_jacko: (Vote Saxon)
To those despairing today that the UK (especially England) has abandoned its common sense and morality:

- The UK population is about 66.5 million.
- 14.6 million people voted Conservative/Brexit/UKIP.
- 16.3 million people voted for left-leaning parties.
- Nearly 20 million people were unable to vote.
- In every nation of the UK, a majority of the votes cast were for left-leaning, Remain-leaning parties.

We need proportional representation. We really, really do.

We also need more understanding and transparency, rather than tribalism and propaganda. I am not a fan of accusing millions of voters of being fascists.

Once more, we have a government that most people did not vote for. It now looks almost inevitable that the UK will leave the EU on 31st January. I am very sad about both of these things.

But I need to be optimistic that, with a new northern, industrial voter base, we see not just talk, but a genuine return to "one nation" conservatism.

I need to be optimistic that, with a comfortable majority and having "got Brexit done", the Conservatives no longer feel the need to pander to every last far right nut-job on their fringe, and are willing to put the effort into a close, successful future partnership with the EU.

I need to be optimistic that Labour will take a long, hard look at themselves and re-emerge as a credible alternative Government-in-waiting.

I need to be optimistic that, with climate change forming such a huge part of campaigning, the Government is shamed into taking faster, more decisive action than the woefully token pledges in its manifesto.

Above all, I need to be hopeful for an end to the politics of blame and division.

I can dream, right...?

Let's keep the pressure on to make all of these things a reality.
rich_jacko: (Herd of Sheffield - Small Beginnings)
"Remember where you were when Eliud Kipchoge ran 26.2 miles in 1h:59m:40.2s!" they are saying.

I'll remember. When he was crossing the finish line, I was just about to start my final lap of my own personal record-beating run. Okay, I didn't exactly make human history, but it feels like a big personal achievement nontheless. I finally broke through that 20-minute barrier that I've been struggling against for the last 2 years! :o)

Not only that, but a few weeks ago I completed a double milestone by running my 100th Parkrun and completing my 25th Parkrun volunteering on the same morning. I also baked! Here's how Hillsborough Parkrun reported it on that Facebook:



"Thank you very much to Richard Jackson (pictured) who brought along 10kg of delicious flapjacks for all the runners & volunteers to enjoy this morning. This was a lovely gesture from Richard who today celebrated running his 100th parkrun as well as volunteering for the 25th time – 2 t-shirts in one day !! Thank you again Richard."

Parkrun achievements aside, my next big running challenge is almost here. There's only one week to go until I attempt my first marathon and I've been training hard - 10-15K runs during the week (either to Ooty and back, along Rivelin Valley or laps of the park), Parkruns on Saturdays and longer runs on Sundays.

All this training has obviously been paying off. As well as that PB, as I've had a good (park)run of times on Saturdays lately:

DateMy ParkrunsTimePosition
overall
Position
males
Position
VM 40-44
Age-graded
score
17th Aug97th21:3413th/28813th3rd63.76%
24th Aug98th21:2817th/32316th6th64.05%
7th Sept99th20:5617th/40716th4th65.68%
14th Sept100th20:5428th/42624th3rd65.79%
21st Sept101st20:3918th/31918th1st!66.59%
28th Sept102nd24:0691st/42684th6th57.05%
5th Oct103rd20:4725th/43124th2nd66.16%
12th Oct104th19:5918th/46115th3rd68.81%

Bold indicates a PBs, italics an ususual run - touring at Bury St Edmunds on 21st September and pacing 24 minutes on 28th September. Volunteer-wise, I was on time-keeping duty on 31st August, close-down on 7th September, set-up on 14th September and the aforementioned pacing on 28th September.

(And, just so I remember my PB lap split - 06:35 at the end of lap 1; 13:15 at the end of lap 2; 19:59 at the finish.)

I was a few weeks late starting longer runs, but I've more-or-less stuck to my training plan since. I've run in sunshine, the wind and the rain, although I haven't braved torrential downpours and I'm hoping to avoid them on the day! For the last couple of weeks, I've been tapering down for the big day. My Sunday run diary has looked like this:

  • 18th August - 26.3 km/16.3 miles, Meadowhall and back via the Five Weirs Walk and the canal path. 62% of a marathon in 2h23m00s, 59.6% of my 4-hour target time.

  • 25th August - 32.2 km/20.0 miles, Rivelin Valley and Crosspool, out to Forge Dam and back via the University. 76.3% of a marathon run in 3h2m52s, 76.2% of my target time.

  • 1st September - 28.2 km/17.5 miles, Meadowhall via Firth Park and Concord Park, then back again via the canal path. 66.8% of a marathon in 2h29m08s, 62.1% of my 4-hour target time.

  • 8th September - 22.1 km/13.7 miles, out to Damflask, two laps around the reservoir and back. 52.4% of a marathon in 1h59m06s, 49.6% of my target time.

  • 15th September - 28.2 km/17.5 miles, an Ooty loop followed by Rivelin Valley/Crosspool/Eccy Road via the Botanical Gardens. 66.8% of a marathon in 2h30m51s, 62.9% of my target time.

  • 22nd September - No run this week owing to my long weekend away in Suffolk/Cambridgeshire.

  • 28th September - A Saturday rather than Sunday run. 34.1K or 21.1 miles, out along the canal path to Rotherham and back via the Five Weirs Walk. 80.7% of a marathon in 3h05m50s, 77.4% of my target time.

  • 6th October - 30.4 km/18.9 miles, Forge Dam and back via the University and Botanical Gardens, plus an Ooty loop at the end. 72.0% of a marathon in 2h45m00s, 68.8% of my target time.

  • 13th October -21.1 km/13.1 miles, Damflask and back, Rivelin and back, then 3 laps of the park. 50.0% of a marathon in 1h46m54s, 44.5% of my target time.




Lots of people have sponsored me for the Yorkshire Marathon already - Thank you so much! I'm already raising more than a penny for every metre (!) and I'm very close to my £500 target. If you haven't sponsored me yet and would like to, you can do so here.

I'd also love to see you at the finish line if you fancy a trip to York next weekend. All going well, I should hopefully be crossing the line sometime between 1:15pm and 2:15pm. (4 hours would be 1:30pm but I'm not confident enough to be any more precise than an hour-long window!)

Wish me luck!
rich_jacko: (ice drop)
75 years ago today, the 10-man crew of the US bomber, Mi Amigo, lost their lives as they saved their doomed plane from crashing onto Sheffield civilians. I went along to the flypast commemorating the event in Endcliffe Park this morning.

There was a huge crowd and it was great to see so many people. The BBC were there in force - I saw Steph McGovern and Charlie Stayt broadcasting from the Breakfast sofa and interviewing Tony Foulds, the man who has spent his life looking after the memorial after witnessing the crash as a young boy. Some people have decried the media circus, but I think it's wonderful that it's raised both local and national awareness of what was previously a little-known piece of history and to appreciate what the Mi Amigo crew did that day.


The names of the airmen were read out in a solemn ceremony as their photos appeared on the big screen: Pilot Lt John Kriegshauser (pilot), 2nd Lt Lyle Curtis (co-pilot), 2nd Lt John Humphrey (navigator), Melchor Hernandez (bombardier), Harry Estabrooks (engineer and gunner), Charles Tuttle (gunner), Robert Mayfield (radio operator), Vito Ambrosio (gunner), Malcolm Williams (gunner) and Maurice Robbins (gunner).

The flypast itself began at 8:45am and consisted of 11 planes: a Dakota, Typhoon, CV-22 Osprey, MC-130J Commando II, KC-135 Stratotanker and four F-15E Strike Eagles - one of which spiralled above the rest in a spectacular finish. They were flying out of the sun, which made it difficult to get good photos, but the skies were clear and it was an impressive show.

I am very glad I went.

rich_jacko: (Vote Saxon)
Clearly a standard reply, and doesn't answer my questions about the logic of Labour's Brexit proposals or whether any version of Brexit is better than remaining an EU member. It's marginally better than nothing, I suppose. The gist seems to be, "Any deal is better than a May deal, so vote for us!"



From: Gill Furniss (gill.furniss.mp@parliament.uk)
To: [ ]
Date: 25 January 2019 13:34
Subject: Brexit and the Withdrawal agreement - an update (Case Ref: [ ])

Dear Richard,

In the last few weeks, I have been contacted by hundreds of local people, expressing many different views both about Theresa May’s proposed Brexit deal and the decisions MP are being asked to take about our exit from the European Union. I am tremendously grateful for everyone who has taken the time to get in touch. At every stage, it has been important to know what people across Brightside and Hillsborough think.

Most people, whether they voted to leave or to remain, told me that they thought the withdrawal agreement that May brought back was completely unacceptable. This so-called deal left us facing a blind Brexit in which we were asked to leave with no idea of our future trading relationship with the EU alongside the prospect of being subject to a trading backstop which we have no power to end ourselves. The deal was bad for jobs and the economy. It failed Labour’s six tests for a deal and rejected our sensible proposal to form a new customs union with the EU, the most effective way to give the frictionless trade that business needs. It came with a political declaration which is simply a twenty-six-page wish list and not a guarantee of our future relationship with the EU.
MP cannot overturn the referendum result, but I know that many people believe that a public vote may be the only way forward. It is for this reason that Labour have put forward proposals to Parliament that would give MPs the chance to decide whether a referendum is the right option for our country. This proposal is alongside our work to win support in Parliament for our proposals for a new customs union and a close relationship to the Single Market.

I did not come into politics to make my constituents poorer. I will not accept any result that causes huge damage to Sheffield and that means that I must reject any notion that we could leave with ‘no deal’. This would be devastating locally and nationally as is shown by analysis from many organisations. I will be supporting efforts in the coming days and weeks to ensure that no deal is ruled out.

I have never seen our Country so divided as it is now over Brexit. My guiding principles are to protect our communities from the economic damage that a hard Brexit will cause and respond to the reasons why people wanted to leave the European Union. There is no simple answer but it is now abundantly clear that Theresa May cannot achieve this. Only a Labour government can bring the country together and the fight to win one goes on.


Yours sincerely,

Gill Furniss MP
Sheffield Brightside and Hillsborough
 
rich_jacko: (Vote Saxon)
From: [ ]
To: gill.furniss.mp@parliament.uk
Date: 11 January 2019 20:27
Subject: Please support a second EU referendum


Dear Ms Furniss,

I have written to you on two previous occasions, about different issues, but did not receive a reply. I realise you must receive a lot of correspondence, but I hope this occasion will be different and you will be able to respond to the points I am raising, especially as they concern our future as a nation.

I am talking, of course, about Brexit, and specifically about the Labour Party's position on Brexit.

Labour are arguing against asking voters to reconsider decisions they made in 2016 which directly addressed the question. Instead, they say, there should be another general election. This would ask voters to reconsider decisions they made in 2017, which don't directly address the question. I have to say this seems rather self-serving.

More than that, though, it assumes the choice that should be put to voters is not whether we should Leave or Remain in the EU, but only whether we should be forced to endure a Tory Brexit or a Labour Brexit. Only 6,000 votes separated Leave and Remain in Sheffield, so that feels like the wrong question. But more than that, voters can only make a meaningful choice if we know what each of those options means.

As of today, we know that a Tory Brexit means Mrs May's deal or No Deal. You don't need to tell me, as I am fully convinced that No Deal would be a disaster and Mrs May's is a terrible deal that compares very badly with the deal we have now as a member of the EU. But I can at least see that it does attempt to honour the referendum result by "taking back control" in a number of areas. Some of that control is uncertain, and contingent on escaping the Backstop, but there is a logic to it.

I'm afraid I cannot see the logic to Labour's version of Brexit. It's not enough to say it's not as bad as the Tory version. We need to know what's good about it.

If I've understood right (and please correct me if I'm wrong), a Labour Brexit would see the UK:

- in a permanent customs union with the EU
- in a relationship akin to the single market (including ongoing financial contributions to the EU budget and potentially signing up to the Four Freedoms, including freedom of movement)
- protecting workers' rights and environmental standards by continuing to adhere to EU rules

Now, those might well all be very laudible aims, but the result doesn't look very much like Brexit. It looks rather more like "BINO" ("Brexit In Name Only"). Can you honestly, hand on heart, say that this plan honours the referendum result in anything more than a very technical sense? Can you explain how it addresses the reasons why people voted Leave?

The only tangible difference I can see is that it reduces the UK's status from "rule maker" to "rule taker". What do we get in return? What benefits would there be over remaining an EU member?

I can't see any. It just looks like an exercise in damage limitation when compared with a Tory Brexit. If that's the case, Labour should stop accepting Brexit as something inevitable and that "damage control" is good enough. Labour should have the courage to tell voters they were sold a lie and that there is no left wing case for Brexit - as your colleague, David Lammy MP, did in his excellent speech earlier this week.

I am asking you to please campaign for the following, both in Parliament as MP for Brightside and Hillsborough, and to your party leadership to adopt as official Labour policy:

1) immediate suspension or revocation of the Article 50 notification, while we as a country sort this mess out;

2) a full public consultation, aimed at identifying the underlying issues behind WHY people voted Leave or Remain in 2016, and a national strategy to tackle those issues;

3) having done that, and had the informed debate we should have had in 2016, a second referendum to settle the question of our EU membership once and for all - with Labour campaigning strongly in favour of Remain.

The strategy in 2) should inform what happens next, whether it's the terms of how we Leave or the changes we need to make to the status quo if we choose to Remain.

I think this is the only sensible way forward and I hope that you will be able to confirm you will campaing for it, or something similar. If you disagree with it, I would also be very interested to understand your reasons why - and in particular if you believe your constituents have anything at all to gain from ANY of the versions of Brexit on offer.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Many thanks,

[name and address]
rich_jacko: (Union Jack)
Blimey, what a week in politics, eh? It's been one of those where, against my better judgement, I found myself glued to the news feeds, waiting to see whatever's going to happen next.

I have to admire Theresa May's determination and resilience. I'd have told her party to sod off and sort it out themselves long ago, if it were me. May has made some dreadful choices on the way here, but she honestly seems to believe her deal is the best way forward. The problem is, no one else does. My own view, from as much as I've read, is that it is a terrible deal. It mainly seems to be about how the 2-year transition period will operate, with almost everything about the future UK/EU relationship still to be negotiated. We'd be committing to payin £39bn and being locked into a customs arrangement, in which we'd follow many of the EU's rules, but with no say over them, until such time as we can agree a future partnership. Not exactly a strong position in which to begin the next round of negotiations. Where's the incentive for the EU to ever offer us a good trade deal if they can just lock us into this in perpetuity? I can see why both Leavers and Remainers hate it.

But I can also see the argument that it's probably the least worst unhappy compromise we were ever likely to get from the Commission. In most negotiations, both parties aim for that sweet spot where you find a "win/win" outcome. But the Commission is idealogically opposed to "win/win" being an acceptable outcome. Is a better deal possible? Probably not. I always said I had voted Remain to avoid making a mess.

So what does happen next? A Tory leadership challenge seems almost inevitable, but May will probably win it. It's hard to think of any other candidates who wouldn't be completely unacceptable to either one fringe of the party or another. She won't get her deal through Parliament, although it all seems a bit late for Parliament to have suddenly grown a backbone. If it wanted to dictate what would happen in the event the Government couldn't get its deal through Parliament, the time to do that was when passing the European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Act 2017 or the European Union (withdrawal) Act 2018. As things stand, if the deal doesn't go through, we crash out with no deal on 29 March next year.

Part of me wonders whether May's steadfast refusal to consider any other option is a tactic to try to get her deal through. After all, if the EU could see there was a chance of cancelling Brexit, in whole or in part, the deal they'd offer could be even worse. Will she change her stance if the EU27 sign the deal off? Or if our Parliament doesn't? Legally, Parliament has signed away authority for her to do whatever she wants, but it remains sovereign. It would be politically hard for her to ignore a Commons vote on what she should do next. If the will was there, they could even force through emergency legislation to force her hand.

But we're still lacking decent alternatives. The EU has said it's this, no deal or no Brexit (yay!). I can see they might feel an obligation to renegotiate if there were a new Government, but that seems unlikely. The Commons may not vote for the deal, but they aren't going to vote for a general election either - that needs two thirds of the House to support it, and I can't see enough Tories going for it. Not that Labour offer any helpful solution anyway, beyond their self-serving call for an election. Their official policy (such as it is) has most of the drawbacks of May's plan - locking us into an agreement as "rule takers, not rule makers" - without even the few scant advantages (massively outweighed by the disadvantages, but at least there's some small logic to it) of leaving that May's does. The main problem with having a general election though, is that we'd probably end up with the same result as the last one, solving nothing.

So what about another referendum, a "people's vote", on the outcome? Well, one problem is the question - three options doesn't work. Although the hard-line Brexiteers won't like it, I can't see Parliament approving a question with a catastrophic "no deal" on the ballot paper. So I guess it would come down to choosing between May's deal versus Remain. That could work, and it's starting to look like the only light at the end of the tunnel. The main problem with having a second referendum though, is that we'd probably end up with the same result as the last one, solving nothing.

Opinion polls show a 6-10% lead for Remain at the moment, but that's not far off what they were before the first referendum. The polls also show that Leave voters are much more likely to turn up at the ballot box, to make sure "the will of the people" is honoured. Voter turnout amongst the under 30s looks like it would stay abysmally low.

If there is another vote, there needs to be a concerted effort to change people's minds. My social media friends, we need to be self-aware enough to recognise that we exist in our own little political bubble. It's very easy to criticise Leave voters as being wrong, ignorant or racist, but that's not going to persuade any of them to vote differently. We need to "check our privilege" and remember who Leave voters are for the most part - the poor, the elderly, the less well educated, the forgotten voters of non-metropolitan England, those who feel that the whole political system has failed them and overlooked them, to the extent that they might as well roll the dice in the hope they might - just might - get something better. Telling them they're stupid or wrong just makes us look like the "liberal elite" who don't understand their concerns.

So if there is going to be another vote, we - not just politicians and leaders in civil society, but all Remain supporters up and down the country - need to start talking and understanding the reasons why other people support leaving, what they are hoping for for the future, and how we can achieve the best way of getting there. We need to stop burning bridges, and start building them. If the UK is to have any chance of getting out of this hole we've got ourselves into, the time for the politics of division has to be over. We all have a responsibility for that. I know very few Leave voters (six, at last count), but I'll be working hard to change their minds.

Interesting times, eh?
rich_jacko: (iconic)
...or, bits of my life according to my posts on Facebook, anyway!

9 January at 21:06:
Snow Nessie was 8 years ago! That was probably the last really big snow in Hillsborough. We need more!

17 January at 18:33:
The pavements were covered in slush this morning, so I wore my snow boots for the walk into work. I'd forgotten how cosy they are - toasty toes! :o)

26 January at 22:26:
A long day at work today, but I did get to go to the top of the Walkie-Talkie, which wasn't bad. :o)

29 January at 18:48:
"Problems" it's nice to have: I have a week's holiday I need to use up by the end of February. Any ideas for how I should spend it? Anyone got any exciting plans for half term or anything?

3 February at 12:29:
Hmm, I think the parkrun results must've got one token out of sync at some point this morning. I was faster than that, and there definitely wasn't 13 seconds between me and the guy just in front at the end. There wasn't 5 seconds between Dan and Bryony's photo finish either!
Ah well, it happens. It happened when I was on token duty too. Still a big thank you to all the volunteers!

6 February at 21:25:
Go Falcon Heavy! :oD

9 February at 23:15:
"Old Macdonald had a Farm" in the style of Tom Waits; "We're All Going on a Brexit Holiday"; a death metal version of "God Rest Ye Merry Gentlemen"; "Smoke on the Water" played on cow bells - Bill Bailey, you brilliant, utter loon. A great evening's entertainment at City Hall. At times I was struggling to breathe! :oD

10 February at 10:43:
Yeeeah... I reckon I can do a half-marathon... Ran 17k this morning in about 1h25m (or 2 hours including breaks) - Concord parkrun plus the journey there and back. Pleased with that, but boy it was cold and wet though! Clearly a level of insanity going on here!
rich_jacko: (eclipse)
Well, that was exciting. A close result. (I was predicting 52%:48%, but the other way.)

Shall we do it again in November? Best of three? ;o)

There's going to be a whole new level of craziness over the coming hours and days. But it's in the best interests of everyone (inside and outside the UK) to get the best workable solution all round.

The map of the UK is the real wake-up call here. Areas which political attention has been diverted away from in recent years voted strongly for Leave. I'd be far more worried about disaffected voters in the North of England, Wales and the Midlands, than about those in Scotland, London and Northern Ireland. Politicians need to wake up.

For the rest of us, it's hard, but we should try to keep calm and carry on, folks. Obviously this is very big, but let's keep our sense of perspective.

That is all.

Profile

rich_jacko: (Default)
rich_jacko

September 2024

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
29 30     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 5th, 2025 11:06 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios