rich_jacko: (triceratops)
I've finally got around to finishing my latest modular building project, which I've been working on intermittently for about a year. So here it is:



The Museum is 1,700 pieces in four sections. Unlike certain other museums, this one has a dinosaur skeleton in the entrance hall - the T. Rex from the Research Institute set. The ground floor is devoted to natural history and geology, the first floor to various historical artefacts, and the second floor to maps, exploration and astronomy, with the telescope from the Research Institute gazing out through a suspiciously TIE Fighter-esque window at the top of the building. The roofline to this neo-gothic building incorporates castle flags and some elements from Hogwarts.

The Toy Shop sits beside it, again in four sections, containing 1,840 bricks. I built this one partly to make up for not owning the Grand Emporium set, and partly to contain the minifig-scale toys that I've acquired with various Christmas sets over the years. The first floor has viewing windows to watch the model train above the entrance spin around (yes, it moves!). Naturally the top floor is a Lego shop, mashing together elements from two official sets, plus others I added. Livening up the roofline are big models of a hot air balloon, a rocket ship and an aeroplane.

Here are some close-up views inside, to help give you a feel for the interiors:
IMG_0153

...and some more views of the outside. I've added flower beds, a rainbow bench and various other bits of street furniture to round off the set. These make up 180 pieces, bringing the total build to 3,720 pieces (or 3,860 once you include all the minifigures). No wonder it took a while!

Next project - working all my various modular buildings together...
rich_jacko: (Avatar)
A few years ago, I started a tradition of taking a day trip to some other city on my birthday, instead of going into work. After Peterborough, Liverpool and Carlisle, this year it was Leicester's turn - a city I've been through many times on the train but never properly visited. The weather was a bit patchy but mostly stayed dry. As days go, it was an odd mix of 15th century history and spaceships, spaceships, SPACESHIPS!

I first of all visited the Richard III centre. The displays are very well done (downstairs telling the story of the Wars of the Roses; upstairs telling how his bones were found and analysed), but it can't quite disguise the fact that they don't have any actual artefacts in there. Still, you get to see the dig site itself, with its holographic skeleton!

After that, I went over the road to the cathedral and saw his tomb, then next door to the Guildhall, which was an unexpected treat. It's a huge timber-framed building with many rooms and actual artefacts, plus a good café where I had pie for lunch :o)

In the afternoon, I wandered through the enormous Abbey Park (finding the abbey ruins, Cardinal Wolsey's grave and the Wolsey Chimney along the way) to the National Space Centre. It was deceptively big inside, with the exhibits each going back a long way. I saw spaceships, Apollo records, moon rock, ISS equipment and all sorts of other stuff. There were a few school parties but otherwise, being a weekday, I largely had the place to myself.

The centre closes at 4pm so I only had a couple of hours there (40 minutes of which were taken up by the planetarium show), which wasn't nearly long enough to see everything properly. I guess I'll just have to go back some time! There's also an old pumping station / industrial museum across the road from it, which looks like it's worth a visit too.

I caught the 5pm train and got back to Sheffield just in time to pop round to Blake Street (where there was Van Helsing cheesiness) before heading pubwards for the Third Friday Social. A good birthday all round! :o)





rich_jacko: (Harry Potter)
In-between trips to Leeds last week, I went to a lecture at Sheffield Uni by Audrey Niffenegger, author of The Time Traveller's Wife and Her Fearful Symmetry.

It had the slightly long-winded title, "Work habits: creative procrastination, endless coffee breaks, some thoughts on headphones, or how I eventually managed to overcome inertia and finish the darn book". That's a pretty good summary of what she talked about (plus an immortal cat, an ultra-long-distance relationship and the terror of writing circles).

It was an insight into the writing of The Other Husband, the unexpected (not least to the author) sequel to The Time Traveller's Wife. But it won't be a "more of the same" sequel; some of the ideas in it sound completely bonkers. The first draft was due in January, but probably won't be ready until next January. It will have taken six and a half years by then, averaging just 58 words a day. "Which I think we can all agree is ridiculous", its author admits.

The talk itself was a bit odd. She says normally wings it, but this time thought she'd better write a proper lecture. This meant she was mostly reading from a script. It was funny, sweary and illuminating, but still reading from a script. The best bits were when she looked up and deviated from the page.

This part of the evening was only 30 minutes though. Much better was the 45-minute question and answer session which followed. Having talked about the editing process and about writing character snippets she always knew would never make it into the final draft, I asked if she had a favourite idea that never met the cut. So I learned about Meema, the genetically engineered cat/girl, who won't be appearing in The Other Husband (See, I told you it sounded bonkers), but might appear in some other form in a different future novel.

I got her to autograph my copy of The Time Traveller's Wife at the book signing afterwards. She was there with her husband, Eddie Campbell, who is also famous in his own right as an illustrator (of Alan Moore's From Hell, among other things). I bought a copy of their collaborative short story collection, Bizarre Romance, which they both signed.

Overall, an intriguing and enjoyable evening.
rich_jacko: (Rey & BB-8 by Brian Kesinger)
Two trips to Leeds in the space of a week? Have I gone mad?

On bank holiday Monday, I went with my Sunday roleplaying group to The Great Escape Game, to try to crack King Arthur's Secret. I'd never played an escape room before, but I had a gift voucher from my sister from my birthday last year (Thanks, sis!) which was about to run out...

It was a lot of fun. My expectation that it would be kind of like the mental/mystery challenges in the Crystal Maze was pretty close to the mark. All those co-op board games and roleplaying campaigns had obviously honed our teamwork, and we coordinated ourselves well, divvying up the tasks to solve the puzzles. Having a 10-year-old we could send up the chimney and into other tight spaces helped as well! The game has a 55% escape rate, but we managed to crack it in 32:29 out of our allotted 50 minutes. We all had a great day out :o)



Yesterday, I was back for my second Leeds-based time challenge - the Leeds Half Marathon. Owing to rubbish public transport, I stayed overnight in the Discovery Inn, but it was nice being only 10 minutes walk from the Start/Finish (even nicer after the run!). The crowds weren't as big as for Sheffield, but there was still a good atmosphere.

People had told me this was less hilly than the Sheffield Half Marathon. I'm not sure that's true. The hills might be less steep, but there's a lot of sustained uphill, particularly in the first half. The unrelenting sun, lack of breeze and traffic fumes as we ran along a dual carriageway (with only one of four lanes closed) made the first half really tough. Fortunately the second half made up for it, and was really lovely by comparison. There was more in the way of trees, a bit more of a breeze, beautiful scenery (including running right past Kirkstall Abbey), and a nice lot of downhill.

I had to manage my breathing and a stitch in the last couple of miles, but still felt reasonably okay - and triumphant - as I crossed the finish line. My clock time was 1:42:35 and my chip time was 1:42:17 - just 40 seconds slower than my time for the Sheffield Half, so I'm certainly consistent! I finished in 740th place out of a field of 5,812 runners. Just the big run in October to go now to complete the White Rose Triple...

rich_jacko: (Avatar)
Capernaum - There are echoes of City of God in this frighteningly vivid Lebanese film about a young boy's struggle for survival on the streets of Beirut. The title means "chaos" and there's plenty of that. Zain (Zain Al Rafeea) runs away from home after a terrible betrayal. Rahil (Yordanos Shiferaw) is an undocumented migrant from Ethiopia. Their lives come together but are abruptly torn apart, leaving both struggling to survive. The film drives home the ease with which vulnerable people can fall into desperate measures and become exploited. But it isn't all bleak. There's humour and humanity, and a tremendous sense of energy and life throughout. Not the easiest film to watch, but a rewarding one.

Captain Marvel - 21 films into the MCU, and we finally get one with a female lead. Consequently, I really wanted to like Captain Marvel. Unfortunately the first 20 minutes or so were disappointing - Vers (Brie Larson) and Yon-Rogg (Jude Law) are Kree warriors fighting anonymous alien forces in a rather bland and generic space fantasy. But then we get a massive "WTF?" moment, Vers falls to Earth, Agents Fury and Coulson ("digitally de-aged" Samuel L. Jackson and Clark Gregg) show up, and it gets a whole lot more interesting. I'm not sure when the 1990s became a historical setting, but the film makes the most of it with lots of references and gags. We start to dig into Vers's backstory, meeting the face of the Supreme Intelligence (Anette Benning) and a pilot (Lashana Lynch) who seems to know Vers very well. It's an origin story told almost in reverse, and it just keeps getting better and better as it goes on. So I'm pleased to say that, in the end, I really did like Captain Marvel! :o)

Us - This is more obviously a straight horror flick than the genre-bending Get Out (the previous film by Jordan Peele). It's not quite as clever or politically insightful, but that's setting the bar very high - If you haven't yet seen Get Out, you should. Us is nontheless a superbly written and made horror film. It seems something has been stewing beneath America for many years. As a child, Adelaide has a chilling encounter with a doppelgänger in an abandoned funhouse. Years later, Adelaide (Lupita Nyong'o) and her family return to the area and encounter a whole family of duplicates, who are murderous and speak in whispers. Things rapidly spiral into chaos. It's full of tension and brutality, but also pitch-black comedy. The answers to the mystery, when they come, if not completely satisfactory, are certainly weird and original.

Fighting With My Family - I've never been into WWE wrestling, but this film got such good reviews I thought I'd give it a go. Those reviews were completely justified; I loved this film! There's obviously a double-meaning to the title, with the WWE-obsessed family (an impressive Florence Pugh, her brother Jack Lowden and parents Nick Frost and Lena Headey) squabbling amongst themselves about their future as much as they fight in the ring. This is a labour of love from Stephen Merchant and Dwayne Johnson, based on the true story of a small-time wrestling family from Norwich who dream of making the big league in America. There's obvious comedy to be had from the culture clash but, whenever you think the film is pandering to stereotypes, it surprises you with characters that are much more rounded than they first appear. It's surprisingly charming and engaging, while also being very, very funny. Definitely recommended.

Dumbo - I'm not convinced about Disney's live-action/CGI re-makes, if they're just slavish recreations of the original animation. Fortunately Dumbo takes a different approach. While there are brief nods to many of the set-pieces from the original, there's a whole new story involving Colin Farrell returning from the war and trying to settle back into family life and work, all while their little circus run by Danny DeVito is in the process of being taken over by a villainous Michael Keaton. And whose side is Eva Green on? Sometimes there's so much drama it seems as if there's barely room for a flying elephant. The film starts out as a slightly uneasy marriage between scenes of pure Disney cutesiness and moments that are pure Tim Burton gothic. As the film goes on, it gets progressively less and less Disney, and more and more Tim Burton. This is a joy to watch unfold. I wonder what Uncle Walt would have made of "Nightmare Island"?

Pet Sematary - It was good; Dark Tower was dreadful. Stephen King novels do not always make great films, which is sadly the case with Pet Sematary [sic]. The set-up is decent - family with a haunted past moves to a small town; small town has strangely sinister traditions; John Lithgow knows more than he's letting on; dead pets sometimes come back to life; tragedy strikes. Unfortunately, the execution isn't as clever as the concept. The early scares are mainly cheap "make-you-jump" moments and towards the end it turns into a tedious by-the-numbers slasher flick. As with many film adaptations, I got the impression there's a lot more depth in the book. The film certainly introduces a lot of ideas that it doesn't have time to explore properly. The short running time also meant that the third act felt very rushed indeed (though perhaps that was a blessing). Not worth it.

Missing Link - I like Laika. There's something pleasingly old-fashioned and hand-made about stop-motion animation, and their films (Coraline, ParaNorman, Boxtrolls and Kubo) have all been full of Aardman-like charm that extends beyond merely using the same medium. The same's true of this latest offering, in which Hugh Jackman's Victorian explorer teams up with Zach Galifianakis's Sasquatch and Zoe Saldana's Lady Fortnight in a bid to discover Yetis at Shangri-La. There's plenty of comedy and high stakes and Around the World in 80 Days-type adventure and Stephen Fry as a dastardly villain, but it somehow fails to live up to Laika's previous efforts. It's entertaining enough, but not a must-see.

Avengers: Endgame (no spoilers!) - The secret to Marvel's success is, no matter how bonkers the concepts or the plots, they give us characters we really engage with and care about. The focus this time is (rightly) on the main heroes we've known all the way since "Phase 1", but along the way the story takes in more characters and references to previous films than you probably expect. Pretty much every entry in the 22-film saga is covered, so you'll need to have done your homework with this one! The first act sees our heroes dealing with the ramifications of Infinity War and struggling with what to do next. Act 2 kicks up a gear and spans many locations in a whirlwind of twists and surprises, from the heart-felt to the hilarious. If Act 3 is an indulgently over-the-top finale, boy, have they earned it and boy, is it a crowd-pleaser! What Marvel have achieved with this series is astonishing. Endgame is a satisfying, thrilling and emotional conclusion to so many story arcs, from the personal to the galaxy-spanning. I often feel some films are too long, but there's so much packed into this one that three hours flies past in no time at all. Event movies don't come any bigger or better than this.
rich_jacko: (Herd of Sheffield - Elephant in the Hive)
I seem to have entered the "White Rose Triple" - the first event of which was today. That means getting in some longer distances than regular Parkruns, but getting motivated to do so is a challenge!

A couple of February Parkruns were off my usual pace due to a bad cold, making breathing difficult! I took a week off to volunteer and was back up to a good pace again until mid-March when I started putting in some proper distance running. I ran to Oughtibridge and back before Parkrun on 16th March, did 10 laps on 23rd March and 8 laps on 30th March. 23rd March was a bit of an outlier though - I think I set a new personal fastest lap of 06:28! Unfortunately I knackered my calf muscles the following week, which meant I was slowing Anthony down slightly when I ran with him the week after. On the other hand, I pushed Tim to a new PB for two Parkruns in a row!

Results below. 19th Jan, 16th Feb, 23rd Feb and 6th April were volunteer weeks for me (marshalling with Tani, barcode scanning, set-up and VI guide respectively). I'm now on a mission to coincide my 25th volunteering with my 100th parkrun, probably some time around August/September.

DateMy ParkrunsTimePosition
overall
Position
males
Position
VM 40-44
Age-graded
score
12th Jan73rd21:1222nd/49322nd3rd64.39%
26th Jan74th20:5623rd/45022nd4th65.21%
2nd Feb75th22:1641st/57940th3rd61.30%
9th Feb76th21:4839th/40037th6th62.61%
23rd Feb77th20:4820th/43220th5th65.63%
2nd Mar78th20:5721st/39921st2nd65.16%
9th Mar79th21:2522nd/31521st1st!63.74%
16th Mar80th22:4145th/35540th5th60.18%
23rd Mar81st20:3421st/44219th2nd66.37%
30th Mar82nd22:0950th/45247th8th61.63%
6th Apr83rd22:3535th/38433rd4th60.44%
13th Apr84th21:0621st/37320th4th64.69%


Today was the Sheffield Half Marathon. I ran 13.1 miles in 01:43:20 - all that distance and I sliced a grand total of 12 seconds off last year's time! It still counts as a PB though! My "chip time" was 01:41:42 (over a minute and a half quicker than last year) and I finished in 1,073rd place out of 6,034 runners. :o)

More importantly, I paced myself a lot better this time. I didn't overdo it on the long uphills, which meant I managed to keep running throughout, without having to stop and walk at any point. It also meant I had enough juice left in me to properly enjoy the beautiful last couple of downhill miles along Ecclesall Road South / Ecclesall Road and back into town for beer and medals.

Sheffield Half Marathon 2019 medal

It was a lovely day for running, but very cold once I stopped! I saw several of the Parkrun crowd on the way round and met up with Kelly and Liz at the end.

That felt good. My legs are slightly stiff, I've a blister on one foot and I feel tired, but that didn't wipe me out like it did last year. The Yorkshire Marathon no longer looks quite so impossible after all...
rich_jacko: (Rathan by caerban)
I'd forgotten how much fun creating characters for roleplaying games can be. I've just finished preparing my latest one for Ed's new D&D game. I've gone for the contrasting combo of Forest Gnome and Draconic Bloodline Sorcerer, because... well... it's funny.

This is Dramble Tavartarr. He's your friendly, neighbourhood all-round entertainer, with a big stick and a tendency to play with fire. He's also going through a midlife crisis. Having recently turned the big 2-0-0, he has a bit of a complex about supposedly having a great destiny, but not having had the chance to live it yet. I've written an intro for him on our Google Group for the game, and I'm copying it here too for posterity.

Dramble

"If you buy me a drink, I'll tell you a story."

"Many centuries ago, in arid and distant lands, far from The Valley, lived a mighty dragon. Well, he thought he was mighty (and to you and me he would appear quite fearsome, with his brass-like scales and fiery breath), but by dragon standards he wasn't really. Actually he was a bit of a softy. Liked to chatter with passers-by. If only there were more people passing by. Oh, how foolish for the dragon to wish for that! For giants are not friends of dragons. But the forest folk perhaps are..."

It was a quiet night at the Lakeside inn. An assorted group of humans, halflings and a particularly large half-orc sat huddled in a corner by the fire. A gnome was perched on a bar stool at the centre of the group. Smallish even by gnome standards, he nevertheless held the others in rapt attention. His wild hair flew around him and his eyes sparkled in the firelight as he continued:

"Enter our hero. He'd earned the name Warryn Wildwander when, as a young gnome, he got the wanderlust and began to venture far from home. His clan name was Warryn Tavartarr."

"Tavartarr? Isn't that *your* name, Brighteyes?"

Dramble smiled down from his stool at the eager young halfling. The kid was barely old enough to drink, and sat with his legs crossed on the floor as if he was still at school. He made Dramble feel old. He sighed inwardly and brushed off the feeling.

"Why, so it is!" he replied, with a wink to some of the older members of his audience, who'd heard this story before and knew what was coming.

Dramble continued. He blew on his pan flute - an eerie set of notes - as he began to tell of Warryn stumbling into a home of giants and, trembling, seeking refuge in a cave. Were his audience imagining it, or could they hear the distant sound of giant feet stomping across the fields outside the inn, drawing closer?

"Suddenly, Warryn heard a roar! Much closer and right behind him!" Two halflings and a human jumped. They hadn't imagined it; that had definitely been a creature roaring. It sounded like nothing they had ever heard (certainly nothing that lived in the Valley). Suddenly a burst of flames leapt out of the fire, shaping itself into the form of a dragon.

"It was the dragon, Smaheltersmiddibranner, and he was hiding from the giants too!"

"Wait... Smarheldy-what?"

"Smaheltersmiddibranner. Rolls off the tongue. Now, hiding they both may have been, but Warryn was fearful of ending up a dragon's lunch. He had to impress old Smiddibranner fast."

The story went on. Dramble told how Warryn had impressed the dragon with his quick wits, how they bonded over stories of distant lands, and how they worked together to deceive the giants into leaving them alone. As he did, flames danced in the air in front of him. They took the forms of marching giants, desert caves, and the clever duo of dragon and gnome, all accompanied by disembodied sounds and music he blew on his pipes. Fire flashed in Dramble's eyes as he played out the final chase. The others were sure it wasn't just the reflection from the flames.

"Oi, Jabble Dramble Firespinner, you watch it!" the barmaid shouted. That last fiery giant image had caught part of the counter alight as it ran away, coming rather too close to a clutch of bottles filled with spirits.

"Ooops!" Dramble had the decency to look sheepish. He waved a hand and the flames vanished abruptly.

"That's better," grunted the barmaid, though there was a smile on her face. "You know we likes you bringing folk in 'ere, entertaining 'em with your stories. Especially with how quiet it were yesterday. But it'd be better all round if you spins rather more stories and rather less fires, yes?"

It was Dramble's first evening in the Lakeside Inn for some days. Having been away in the Feygrove this past week, he had missed Dworic's pronouncement of the lost map's discovery, the two bands of adventurers who had ventured out, and the subdued atmosphere in the inn when the first band failed to return as expected the previous night. He was trying to raise everyone's spirits (but not light the spirits, ha!) but inwardly he was kicking himself. Two centuries in the Valley with hardly any excitement and he missed it when adventure finally called!

He hurried on to the finish. "Before they parted, Smaheltersmiddibranner, grateful for Warryn's help, bestowed a great gift on him. The blood of dragons would run in his veins! And not only his, but in certain others of his line who would come after him. They didn't appear in every generation, but those bearing the traits of the dragon...

Dramble paused for the final reveal, rolling his sleeves up to reveal a sheen of brassy scales covering the skin on his arms. There was a gasp, and one or two knowing nods.

"...are said to be destined for great things. Greater even than entertaining you all tonight!"

Dramble smiled. Of all the stories his family had taught him of how Warryn Wildwander had come by his draconic gifts, this was his favourite at the moment. The other one where Warryn had been rewarded for pulling a thorn out of the dragon's side was a little generic, but Dramble thought it had been improved enormously once he changed the thorn for an ogre's spear. The dragon had been called Glaedr Brightscales in that version. Warryn had ridden atop the dragon as together, Wildwander and Brightscales, they chased the ogre back to the mountains. But he'd told that one a lot, a generation ago in human and halfling timescales. This generation needed a fresh story.

He also liked the one where Warryn had been captured by a wicked dragon and tricked it into promising away its power, before using that power to escape its grasp. He might tell that one again some day. It had a lot of cleverness, with all its sneaking around, word tricks and illusions. He could spin that one out for a whole evening with all its twists and turns.

It sometimes felt hollow though. He'd pulled his closing line off with a grin and a flourish, but it had been both bittersweet and true. Two hundred years! He was practically middle-aged. Where was this great destiny he'd been promised all his life? He wanted to live the stories, not just tell them.

"Tell us another one, Brighteyes!"

Dramble was brought out of his reverie by the half-orc, who almost pushed him off his stool by what was clearly meant to be a gentle nudge with her beer tankard. Dramble offered his own tankard in return, now empty. The young halfling leapt up, grabbed it off him and ran to the bar to get another round in. As he did, Dramble settled back in his seat and began to blow a wistful tune.

What story should he tell next? There was the whole saga of Warryn's scrapes and conquests as he learned to master his powers; how he rose to become a mighty sorcerer before meeting an unfortunate end. Or a happily-ever-after end. Did they need to hear a happily-ever-after end this evening, after everything that had happened? Perhaps he could do the tales of some of Warryn's famous descendants instead. Maybe Ella Rosethorn? Or Fabien Fiddlefen and Summer Silverthread? Or...

Before the gnome could decide, the door to the inn burst open and a strangely assorted group wandered in. Dramble recognised a few of them by sight, and knew them to be the second party of explorers. They had returned! What wonders had they seen? What adventures must they have had? He had to know! This was his chance!

"Sorry, friends. Another night, perhaps. I think the stage is theirs now!"

The gnome leapt off his stool and nudged his way past the patrons nearer the entrance, who had stood up to greet the newcomers. The travellers looked down (Well, *most* of them looked down...) at the diminutive figure in front of them, who was grinning from ear to ear and offering an outstretched hand.

"Hi, the name's Dramble Warryn Smiddibranner. I'd be very pleased to make your acquaintance."

"If I buy you a drink, will you tell me your story?"
rich_jacko: (ice drop)
75 years ago today, the 10-man crew of the US bomber, Mi Amigo, lost their lives as they saved their doomed plane from crashing onto Sheffield civilians. I went along to the flypast commemorating the event in Endcliffe Park this morning.

There was a huge crowd and it was great to see so many people. The BBC were there in force - I saw Steph McGovern and Charlie Stayt broadcasting from the Breakfast sofa and interviewing Tony Foulds, the man who has spent his life looking after the memorial after witnessing the crash as a young boy. Some people have decried the media circus, but I think it's wonderful that it's raised both local and national awareness of what was previously a little-known piece of history and to appreciate what the Mi Amigo crew did that day.


The names of the airmen were read out in a solemn ceremony as their photos appeared on the big screen: Pilot Lt John Kriegshauser (pilot), 2nd Lt Lyle Curtis (co-pilot), 2nd Lt John Humphrey (navigator), Melchor Hernandez (bombardier), Harry Estabrooks (engineer and gunner), Charles Tuttle (gunner), Robert Mayfield (radio operator), Vito Ambrosio (gunner), Malcolm Williams (gunner) and Maurice Robbins (gunner).

The flypast itself began at 8:45am and consisted of 11 planes: a Dakota, Typhoon, CV-22 Osprey, MC-130J Commando II, KC-135 Stratotanker and four F-15E Strike Eagles - one of which spiralled above the rest in a spectacular finish. They were flying out of the sun, which made it difficult to get good photos, but the skies were clear and it was an impressive show.

I am very glad I went.

rich_jacko: (River Tam XKCD)
The Favourite - This is currently getting a lot of awards season praise, and deservedly so. It's a viciously black comedy that tells the at-least-partially-true story of the rivalry between Abigail (Emma Stone) and Lady Sarah (Rachel Weisz) for Queen Anne (Olivia Colman)'s affections. Personal rivalry, politics and backstabbing abound. Absurd and outrageously rude, while being surprisingly historically accurate, this is not a normal period drama. I loved it and laughed like a drain. Any film which includes in its cast list "Fastest Duck in the City" and "Naked Pomegranate Tory" has got to intrigue you at the very least...

Mary, Queen of Scots - This, on the other hand, was a disappointment. Billed as the story of the rivalry between Mary Stuart (Saoirse Ronan) and Elizabeth I (Margot Robbie), unfortunately both queens come across as being somewhat adrift on the seas of surrounding events and constantly manipulated by the men around them. They only meet once in the film, and it's a rather unsatisfactory scene in which I couldn't help but want to tell them both to get a grip. It's a meandering film that doesn't really go anywhere, glosses past a lot of the more interesting parts of Mary and Elizabeth's stories and is, on the whole, just a bit dull. Don't bother.

Glass - The third in M. Night Shyamalan's 'Unbreakable' trilogy. David Dunn (Bruce Willis), Kevin Wendall Crumb (James McAvoy) and Mr Glass himself (Samuel L. Jackson) all find themselves trapped in a psychiatric hospital, where Dr Ellie Staple (Sarah Paulson) tries to convince them their supposed superpowers are all a delusion. It's very much what you'd expect from Shyamalan - lots of clever connections with previous films, multiple plot threads and twists (some more obvious than others), and somewhat up its own arse. It's clever, and I like all the lead characters, but ultimately never quite hits the mark. If you saw the others, you might want to see this for completeness, but it won't win over any new fans.

How To Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World - The third, and definitely final, HTTYD film. Our gang of vikings, led by Hiccup (Jay Baruchel) and Astrid (America Ferrera), are in search of a new home, safe from new-to-the-franchise dragon hunter, Grimmel (F. Murray Abraham). Meanwhile, Hiccup and Astrid have commitment issues, Toothless gets a girlfriend (Is this a kissing movie?) and starts to grow apart from Hiccup. Unfortunately, at times the film is too obsessed with bringing everything to a conclusion to remember to have fun. Ruff and Tuff are still a hoot, but they are the highlight. There's way too much human melodrama and not nearly enough of the sense of adrenaline and pure joy you got from the dragon-riding sequences of the earlier films. It's still enjoyable, but definitely the weakest of the three.

The Lego Movie 2: The Second Part - Lego have very much hit a formula about families learning to "play well" together. This time around, it's the kid from the first film (Jadon Sand, now a teenager) and his younger sister (Brooklynn Prince) trying to get along. Translated into the Lego world, this means Emmet (Chris Pratt) and Lucy (Elizabeth Banks)'s gritty, battle-scarred, teen-angsty Apocalypseburg being invaded by the glittery alien forces of General Mayhem (Stephanie Beatriz), Queen Watevra (Tiffany Haddish) and their vampire heartthrob DJs. This does everything a sequel should - build on the strengths of the first film while taking it in enough of a new direction to be a worthwhile film in its own right. It may not feel as fresh, but it's a league above the Batman and Ninjago spin-offs. All the inventive silliness, self-reverential humour, pop culture gags and catchy songs are as good as the first time around. Everything is still awesome. :o)

Alita: Battle Angel - Robert Rodriguez: a director famous for making a $20 million movie look like a $200 million movie. So, when you pair him with James Cameron and give him an actual $200 million budget, you know it's going to look spectacular. Alita (Rosa Salazar) is an impressively-out-of-the-uncanny-valley cyborg, with no memory, found in a junk pile and brought back to life by Ido (Christoph Waltz) into a cyberpunk dystopia that's literally straight out of a mange comic. A centuries-ago war casts a long shadow, as does the mysterious flying city of Zalem. The story is bonkers and only half-told, with a lot of unexplained backstory and unresolved conflict left for sequels. But it's essentially about Alita working out what type of person she is. Plus cyborgs smashing the hell out of each other. The characters and action are strong enough to make it work. It's also a great IMAX experience, especially the Motorball sequences. Now this is podracing! ;o)
rich_jacko: (Vote Saxon)
Clearly a standard reply, and doesn't answer my questions about the logic of Labour's Brexit proposals or whether any version of Brexit is better than remaining an EU member. It's marginally better than nothing, I suppose. The gist seems to be, "Any deal is better than a May deal, so vote for us!"



From: Gill Furniss (gill.furniss.mp@parliament.uk)
To: [ ]
Date: 25 January 2019 13:34
Subject: Brexit and the Withdrawal agreement - an update (Case Ref: [ ])

Dear Richard,

In the last few weeks, I have been contacted by hundreds of local people, expressing many different views both about Theresa May’s proposed Brexit deal and the decisions MP are being asked to take about our exit from the European Union. I am tremendously grateful for everyone who has taken the time to get in touch. At every stage, it has been important to know what people across Brightside and Hillsborough think.

Most people, whether they voted to leave or to remain, told me that they thought the withdrawal agreement that May brought back was completely unacceptable. This so-called deal left us facing a blind Brexit in which we were asked to leave with no idea of our future trading relationship with the EU alongside the prospect of being subject to a trading backstop which we have no power to end ourselves. The deal was bad for jobs and the economy. It failed Labour’s six tests for a deal and rejected our sensible proposal to form a new customs union with the EU, the most effective way to give the frictionless trade that business needs. It came with a political declaration which is simply a twenty-six-page wish list and not a guarantee of our future relationship with the EU.
MP cannot overturn the referendum result, but I know that many people believe that a public vote may be the only way forward. It is for this reason that Labour have put forward proposals to Parliament that would give MPs the chance to decide whether a referendum is the right option for our country. This proposal is alongside our work to win support in Parliament for our proposals for a new customs union and a close relationship to the Single Market.

I did not come into politics to make my constituents poorer. I will not accept any result that causes huge damage to Sheffield and that means that I must reject any notion that we could leave with ‘no deal’. This would be devastating locally and nationally as is shown by analysis from many organisations. I will be supporting efforts in the coming days and weeks to ensure that no deal is ruled out.

I have never seen our Country so divided as it is now over Brexit. My guiding principles are to protect our communities from the economic damage that a hard Brexit will cause and respond to the reasons why people wanted to leave the European Union. There is no simple answer but it is now abundantly clear that Theresa May cannot achieve this. Only a Labour government can bring the country together and the fight to win one goes on.


Yours sincerely,

Gill Furniss MP
Sheffield Brightside and Hillsborough
 
rich_jacko: (Calcifer)
Inspired by the new Ultrakatty set, I give you a glorious, can't-believe-no-one's-thought-of-it-before, Lego Movie / My Neighbour Totoro crossover :o)

(Okay, so a Catbus should really have 12 legs and the proportions aren't quite right, but I'm working with the bricks I've got, and you get the idea!)

Total pieces (excluding minifigs): approx. 780
Total build time: approx. 4 hours

rich_jacko: (Vote Saxon)
From: [ ]
To: gill.furniss.mp@parliament.uk
Date: 11 January 2019 20:27
Subject: Please support a second EU referendum


Dear Ms Furniss,

I have written to you on two previous occasions, about different issues, but did not receive a reply. I realise you must receive a lot of correspondence, but I hope this occasion will be different and you will be able to respond to the points I am raising, especially as they concern our future as a nation.

I am talking, of course, about Brexit, and specifically about the Labour Party's position on Brexit.

Labour are arguing against asking voters to reconsider decisions they made in 2016 which directly addressed the question. Instead, they say, there should be another general election. This would ask voters to reconsider decisions they made in 2017, which don't directly address the question. I have to say this seems rather self-serving.

More than that, though, it assumes the choice that should be put to voters is not whether we should Leave or Remain in the EU, but only whether we should be forced to endure a Tory Brexit or a Labour Brexit. Only 6,000 votes separated Leave and Remain in Sheffield, so that feels like the wrong question. But more than that, voters can only make a meaningful choice if we know what each of those options means.

As of today, we know that a Tory Brexit means Mrs May's deal or No Deal. You don't need to tell me, as I am fully convinced that No Deal would be a disaster and Mrs May's is a terrible deal that compares very badly with the deal we have now as a member of the EU. But I can at least see that it does attempt to honour the referendum result by "taking back control" in a number of areas. Some of that control is uncertain, and contingent on escaping the Backstop, but there is a logic to it.

I'm afraid I cannot see the logic to Labour's version of Brexit. It's not enough to say it's not as bad as the Tory version. We need to know what's good about it.

If I've understood right (and please correct me if I'm wrong), a Labour Brexit would see the UK:

- in a permanent customs union with the EU
- in a relationship akin to the single market (including ongoing financial contributions to the EU budget and potentially signing up to the Four Freedoms, including freedom of movement)
- protecting workers' rights and environmental standards by continuing to adhere to EU rules

Now, those might well all be very laudible aims, but the result doesn't look very much like Brexit. It looks rather more like "BINO" ("Brexit In Name Only"). Can you honestly, hand on heart, say that this plan honours the referendum result in anything more than a very technical sense? Can you explain how it addresses the reasons why people voted Leave?

The only tangible difference I can see is that it reduces the UK's status from "rule maker" to "rule taker". What do we get in return? What benefits would there be over remaining an EU member?

I can't see any. It just looks like an exercise in damage limitation when compared with a Tory Brexit. If that's the case, Labour should stop accepting Brexit as something inevitable and that "damage control" is good enough. Labour should have the courage to tell voters they were sold a lie and that there is no left wing case for Brexit - as your colleague, David Lammy MP, did in his excellent speech earlier this week.

I am asking you to please campaign for the following, both in Parliament as MP for Brightside and Hillsborough, and to your party leadership to adopt as official Labour policy:

1) immediate suspension or revocation of the Article 50 notification, while we as a country sort this mess out;

2) a full public consultation, aimed at identifying the underlying issues behind WHY people voted Leave or Remain in 2016, and a national strategy to tackle those issues;

3) having done that, and had the informed debate we should have had in 2016, a second referendum to settle the question of our EU membership once and for all - with Labour campaigning strongly in favour of Remain.

The strategy in 2) should inform what happens next, whether it's the terms of how we Leave or the changes we need to make to the status quo if we choose to Remain.

I think this is the only sensible way forward and I hope that you will be able to confirm you will campaing for it, or something similar. If you disagree with it, I would also be very interested to understand your reasons why - and in particular if you believe your constituents have anything at all to gain from ANY of the versions of Brexit on offer.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Many thanks,

[name and address]
rich_jacko: (Harry Potter)
As I mentioned a year ago, I wanted to spend some time in 2018 actually re-reading some of the books I've already got, rather than merely devouring new ones. And I did. This year, I have re-read:

  • His Dark Materials et al (Philip Pullman)
  • all of The Dresden Files (Jim Butcher) - now please hurry up and finish writing Peace Talks, Jim!
  • Gulliver's Travels (Jonathan Swift)
  • various Roald Dahls, and also read Boy and Going Solo for the first time

I haven't only been re-reading, of course. On top of that, this year I have also read:

  • The Thrilling Adventures of Lovelace & Babbage (Sydney Padua) - possibly my new favourite book ever!
  • Dunstan (Conn Iggulden)
  • Star Wars: Scoundrels (Timothy Zahn)
  • The Furthest Station (Ben Aaronovitch)
  • The Signalman (Charles Dickens)

...and quite a lot of non-fiction for a change:

  • Harry Potter: A History of Magic (various)
  • Other Minds: The Octopus and the Evolution of Intelligent Life (Peter Godfrey-Smith)
  • Hello, Is This Planet Earth? (Major Tim Peake)
  • Rise (Gina Miller)
  • We Have No Idea: A Guide to the Unknown Universe (Jorge Cham & Daniel Whiteson)

I still have a few books waiting on my "to read" shelf, but beyond those, I have no idea what I'll be reading in 2019 yet! :o)
rich_jacko: (TFs 2007)
Peterloo - Mike Leigh tells us the story of a little-known (Well, by me anyway) part of British history, the 1819 Peterloo Massacre, at which a peaceful pro-democracy rally at St Peter's Field in Manchester ended with (spoiler alert) a bloody cavalry charge and many civilians killed or injured. There's plenty of background to the campaign for political reform (some might say too much). We follow one family in particular, led by Maxine Peake's Nellie, to provide the human interest, but even with that we have 2 hours that are... well, all a bit dull really. Many characters are too caricatured to hold any interest (casting Tim McInnery as the Prince Regent was definitely a mistake) and you get a sense that the protesters are being manipulated by politicians on both sides rather than taking their own stand. The final scenes of the massacre itself are shocking and stay in the mind, but not enough to redeem the film.

They Shall Not Grow Old - "Filmed on location on the Western Front, 1914 to 1918," say the end credits. This is an astonishing labour of love from Peter Jackson, who has digitally smartened up and colourised documentary footage from WW1 and added foley so that it appears like it was shot yesterday. This is more than just a gimmick; it gives us an up close and personal view of life in the trenches like never before. All accompanied by voice-over footage taken from archive interviews with soldiers who were there. So many aspects strike home, like how incredibly young many of the troops were; the early sense of adventure giving way to brutal realities; the switch from the mundane to the terrifying when battle broke; and the camaraderie, even with captured enemy PoWs. It is by no means easy viewing, but there is a lot of humour and humanity on show too. You will never look at the War in quite the same way again afterwards. It should be compulsory viewing in schools. And for everyone else as well.

Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald - This is film number 2 of 5, apparently, and it shows. While the first film was a refreshing look at the wizarding world through the lens of 1930s New York, unfortunately there's nothing refreshing about this over-burdened sequel. Oh, Newt (Eddie Redmayne) is still as endearing a reluctant hero as ever, but the storyline creaks horribly under its own weight. JK Rowling seems to have got carried away trying to reference every little bit of backstory in her expansive world, there are far too many characters with uncertain motivations, and the whole thing is clearly just an overly convoluted set-up for films 3-5. And despite the title, there's disappointingly little Grindelwald. It is spectacular, and there are a couple of intriguing developments towards the end, but I'd expected so much more.

Ralph Breaks the Internet: Wreck-it Ralph 2 - My new favourite Disney princess movie! And a rare sequel that's better than the first! It's certainly on a bigger scale, as arcade game characters Vanellope (Sarah Silverman) and Ralph (John C. Reilly) run riot over the whole of the World Wide Web. Cue endless website-related gags and cameos, including (of course) the other Disney princesses, who steal the show whenever they appear. It's not all cutesy though - Disney.com is now patrolled by Imperial Stormtroopers, and our heroes also land in a surprisingly gritty GTA-type game called Slaughter Race (with a hardcore boss character voiced by Wonder Woman herself, Gal Godot). The story is pretty flimsy, but there's enough gags aimed at all ages to keep it going strong. One scene in particular had me laughing along uncontrollably with the rest of the cinema audience for about two minutes solid - Let's just say that if this doesn't win the Oscar for Best Original Song, there is no justice in the world! ;o)

Spider-man: Into the Spider-verse - No, it's not an MCU film, but an animated multiverse mash-up of Spider-men, a Spider-boy, two Spider-girls and one Spider-pig from the creators of the Lego movies. Their style shows through in the madcap humour and ridiculously fast-paced action sequences. The universe-bending storyline is just as frenetic, but there's real heart to it too. Brooklyn teenager Miles Morales gets, you've guessed it, bitten by a radioactive spider and soon has to balance school life with stopping Kingpin and his doomsday device. But just as Miles takes up the Spider-mantle from one Peter Parker, another Spider-man appears. And then several more. Of all the various Spider-man films, this is the one that feels most like reading a Spider-man comic, deliberately so. Special mention for Aunt May (who nearly steals the show) and of course the legendary, late Stan Lee. Excelsior!

Mortal Engines - A post-apocalyptic, steampunk future where London rolls around on tank treads destroying other cities and dragging everyone into its control - What are you trying to say, Peter Jackson? ;o) Fugitive Hester Shaw (Hera Hilmar) and museum nerd Tom Natsworthy (Robert Sheehan) are our mismatched heroes, on the run from the maginificently-named Thaddeus Valentine (a scenery-chewing Hugo Weaving), who is up to something sinister in St Paul's Cathedral. Cliches abound. There's a sub-plot involving Hester's connection with an undead mercenary named Shrike (Stephen Lang), which seems to have stumbled in from a much better story. Mortal Engines is visually amazing, but when your heroes constantly run through fires, explosions and tons of tons of falling debris, with barely a scratch on them, you quickly become blasé about any sense of danger there might have been. It all turns into Star Wars in the last half hour, which is not necessarily a bad thing...

Bumblebee - I've avoided Michael Bay's supposed "Transformers" movies since the abymally bad Revenge of the Fallen, but this one didn't look half bad from the trailer. And... it's not. Away from the director's seat, Bay's worst excesses are under control, characters are at the forefront and what we essentially have is a rather sweet story of a teenage girl (Hailee Steinfeld) and her first car. Who just happens to be a giant alien robot. Stranded on Earth in the 1980s and unable to contact home, said alien learns about human culture while being kept hidden from the rest of the family and the interests of the military, who want him for their own ends. Yes, it's BumblebE-T: The Extra-Terrestrial Robot. Crossed with ideas taken from the very first Transformers comics from the early '80s. The lack of originality doesn't matter though; for fans, this is probably the closest to a proper live-action Transformers movie we are ever likely to get.
rich_jacko: (Christmas markets)
Merry Christmas from Rich
rich_jacko: (Union Jack)
Blimey, what a week in politics, eh? It's been one of those where, against my better judgement, I found myself glued to the news feeds, waiting to see whatever's going to happen next.

I have to admire Theresa May's determination and resilience. I'd have told her party to sod off and sort it out themselves long ago, if it were me. May has made some dreadful choices on the way here, but she honestly seems to believe her deal is the best way forward. The problem is, no one else does. My own view, from as much as I've read, is that it is a terrible deal. It mainly seems to be about how the 2-year transition period will operate, with almost everything about the future UK/EU relationship still to be negotiated. We'd be committing to payin £39bn and being locked into a customs arrangement, in which we'd follow many of the EU's rules, but with no say over them, until such time as we can agree a future partnership. Not exactly a strong position in which to begin the next round of negotiations. Where's the incentive for the EU to ever offer us a good trade deal if they can just lock us into this in perpetuity? I can see why both Leavers and Remainers hate it.

But I can also see the argument that it's probably the least worst unhappy compromise we were ever likely to get from the Commission. In most negotiations, both parties aim for that sweet spot where you find a "win/win" outcome. But the Commission is idealogically opposed to "win/win" being an acceptable outcome. Is a better deal possible? Probably not. I always said I had voted Remain to avoid making a mess.

So what does happen next? A Tory leadership challenge seems almost inevitable, but May will probably win it. It's hard to think of any other candidates who wouldn't be completely unacceptable to either one fringe of the party or another. She won't get her deal through Parliament, although it all seems a bit late for Parliament to have suddenly grown a backbone. If it wanted to dictate what would happen in the event the Government couldn't get its deal through Parliament, the time to do that was when passing the European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Act 2017 or the European Union (withdrawal) Act 2018. As things stand, if the deal doesn't go through, we crash out with no deal on 29 March next year.

Part of me wonders whether May's steadfast refusal to consider any other option is a tactic to try to get her deal through. After all, if the EU could see there was a chance of cancelling Brexit, in whole or in part, the deal they'd offer could be even worse. Will she change her stance if the EU27 sign the deal off? Or if our Parliament doesn't? Legally, Parliament has signed away authority for her to do whatever she wants, but it remains sovereign. It would be politically hard for her to ignore a Commons vote on what she should do next. If the will was there, they could even force through emergency legislation to force her hand.

But we're still lacking decent alternatives. The EU has said it's this, no deal or no Brexit (yay!). I can see they might feel an obligation to renegotiate if there were a new Government, but that seems unlikely. The Commons may not vote for the deal, but they aren't going to vote for a general election either - that needs two thirds of the House to support it, and I can't see enough Tories going for it. Not that Labour offer any helpful solution anyway, beyond their self-serving call for an election. Their official policy (such as it is) has most of the drawbacks of May's plan - locking us into an agreement as "rule takers, not rule makers" - without even the few scant advantages (massively outweighed by the disadvantages, but at least there's some small logic to it) of leaving that May's does. The main problem with having a general election though, is that we'd probably end up with the same result as the last one, solving nothing.

So what about another referendum, a "people's vote", on the outcome? Well, one problem is the question - three options doesn't work. Although the hard-line Brexiteers won't like it, I can't see Parliament approving a question with a catastrophic "no deal" on the ballot paper. So I guess it would come down to choosing between May's deal versus Remain. That could work, and it's starting to look like the only light at the end of the tunnel. The main problem with having a second referendum though, is that we'd probably end up with the same result as the last one, solving nothing.

Opinion polls show a 6-10% lead for Remain at the moment, but that's not far off what they were before the first referendum. The polls also show that Leave voters are much more likely to turn up at the ballot box, to make sure "the will of the people" is honoured. Voter turnout amongst the under 30s looks like it would stay abysmally low.

If there is another vote, there needs to be a concerted effort to change people's minds. My social media friends, we need to be self-aware enough to recognise that we exist in our own little political bubble. It's very easy to criticise Leave voters as being wrong, ignorant or racist, but that's not going to persuade any of them to vote differently. We need to "check our privilege" and remember who Leave voters are for the most part - the poor, the elderly, the less well educated, the forgotten voters of non-metropolitan England, those who feel that the whole political system has failed them and overlooked them, to the extent that they might as well roll the dice in the hope they might - just might - get something better. Telling them they're stupid or wrong just makes us look like the "liberal elite" who don't understand their concerns.

So if there is going to be another vote, we - not just politicians and leaders in civil society, but all Remain supporters up and down the country - need to start talking and understanding the reasons why other people support leaving, what they are hoping for for the future, and how we can achieve the best way of getting there. We need to stop burning bridges, and start building them. If the UK is to have any chance of getting out of this hole we've got ourselves into, the time for the politics of division has to be over. We all have a responsibility for that. I know very few Leave voters (six, at last count), but I'll be working hard to change their minds.

Interesting times, eh?
rich_jacko: (Harry Potter)
American Animals - This was a weird one. Part documentary, part drama, it tells the true-life story of four students who try to get rich by stealing rare books from their university library. The thing is, none of them knows how to pull off a heist, and a series of amateurish cock-ups show us what would go wrong if you or I tried this sort of thing for real, and why heists don't go like they usually do in the movies. The humour sits uneasily against the interviews with the real life people involved. It's an intriguing film, well made and well acted, but overall it doesn't work particularly well.

Crazy Rich Asians - I don't usually do rom-coms, but this one looked a bit different and had had a lot of hype. I enjoyed it more than I thought I would. Rachel (Constance Wu) is drawn into fabulously weatlhy Singapore circles as she meets boyfriend Nick (Henry Golding)'s family, who unbeknownst to her are billionnaires. It's a flimsy premise, and the set-up for stereotypical class war bitchiness. But it kind of works, thanks to the likeable leads and a strong performance from Michelle Yeoh as Nick's mother (When did she become old enough to play the lead's mother???), who is by far the most interesting character in the film. The scenery and big budget set-pieces help liven things up too.

A Simple Favour - This absolutely should not work. A Gone Girl type missing person mystery as a brash black comedy? That it does is mainly down to a smart, true-to-life performance from Anna Kendrick as single mom vlogger, Stephanie, who befriends rich businesswoman, Emily (Blake Lively), only for her to disappear. Did she run away? Was she murdered? Stephanie investigates and gets drawn ever deeper into Emily's strange and secretive life. The mystery itself is fairly clichéd, but it doesn't matter. The performances are great and the yo-yoing between serious drama and broad comedy works surprisingly well. A lot of fun.

The House With A Clock In Its Walls - An orphaned boy goes to live with his uncle (Jack Black), who just so happens to be an eccentric wizard. He and his frosty neigbour (Cate Blanchett) guard a deadly secret hidden within his house. Spielberg's name is attached - There's some evidence of his style, and fun to be had with the sniping between the adult leads, but otherwise this is pretty by-the-numbers kids' fantasy stuff. Not worth bothering with.

Bad Times At The El Royale - Drew "Cabin in the Woods" Goddard writes and directs a mystery set in a run-down motel. Without Joss Whedon on board, this is less over the top than CitW, but shares a few of its traits. There's more than a hint of Pulp Fiction and Lost about it too. The chapter-based plot jumps around in time, and every character has a secret (when Jeff Bridges is playing a priest, you just know something's up!), some of which are connected, others not. Very bloody, completely bonkers, and just a little bit brilliant. I enjoyed it a lot, but it won't be everyone's cup of tea.

First Man - A surprisingly downbeat and small-scale biopic of Neil Armstrong. It focuses just as much on Neil (Ryan Gosling)'s grief over the death of his daughter, and the impact that has on his family life, as it does over the mission to the moon. Like the man himself, it's quiet and introspective, with much left unsaid. The NASA parts of the story are a fascinating insight that hammers home the limited technology they had at the time and the fragility of what they were doing - very much "floating in a tin can". I'm not generally a fan of shakycam, but in this it really does make you feel like you're in the cockpit. A worthwhile watch, but perhaps not what you might expect.

The Breadwinner - I had to watch this one on DVD as the cinema release was very limited. It's an animation about Parvana, an 11-year-old girl growing up in Afghanistan under the Taliban. When her father is arrested, she disguises herself as a boy in order to support her family. It's a sensitive portrait of life under a harsh regime, and carefully researched to accurately represent Afghan culture. The "real world" events are intercut with a stylised folk tale, which is slightly reminiscent of "Kubo". While there's a definite story arc, it doesn't wrap up neatly. Parvana's daily struggle goes on. Thought-provoking.

Bohemian Rhapsody - As a Queen fan, I loved this. Okay, it's not exactly revelatory or hard-hitting, but there is drama in there - whether it be Freddie and his fiancée coming to terms with his sexuality, ructions within the band, escaping a self-destructive spiral, or learning of Freddie's terminal illness. This is an affectionate celebration rather than a tragedy, though - as Freddie says, he doesn't want to be an AIDS poster boy, but to carry on entertaining with his music. The film certainly honours that, ticking off all the essential hits. The insights into the song-writing feel true to life, and help make four rock legends feel like regular people. Ultimately, of course, it's the music that lifts it. The show must go on.
rich_jacko: (Calcifer)
Just when I was beginning to despair at the standard blockbuster fare and lack of choice at the cinema, along come a bunch of films that are massively varied and pleasantly surprise me. Alongside some decent blockbuster entertainment too, of course...

Hotel Artemis - This was an unusual one. Jodie Foster plays a nurse running a secret hotel / hospital for hardened criminals in a dystopian, near-future LA. She brooks no nonsense and runs a tight ship. Why does she do it? We gradually learn more about her past as her present day unravels over the course of the film. With riots outside the hotel, and feuds between rival criminals inside, just keeping herself and her patients alive becomes a struggle. And then Jeff Goldblum shows up... I thought this was very good. It's bleak and not to everyone's taste, but at the very least it's an interesting experiment.

Leave No Trace - Another radically different film. Ben Foster and Thomasin McKenzie star as a father and teenage daughter who have chosen to live completely "off the grid", camping out in the forests. But when the authorities find them, they only see a homeless family needing to be re-housed. Father Will can't stand the idea of being trapped by the system, but daughter Tom isn't so certain. The film follows their physical and emotional journey to find a new home. It's a thoroughly believable character piece, with a lot to say about the structures of modern society. The film is hard to track down, but worth the effort.

Mission: Impossible - Fallout - Rather more standard fare for the sixth (!) entry in Tom Cruise's spy franchise. It has no pretensions of being anything other than a Bond-style action thriller, but it does it surprisingly well. All the IMF gang are back, including Ving Rhames, Simon Pegg and Rebecca Ferguson, this time joined by Henry Cavill, who's been assigned by the CIA as the team's babysitter. The plot is your typical "some of our nukes are missing" stuff, but it's only there to serve as a framework for all the insane stunts and frequent double-crosses. All of which are enough to grip your attention, but what really lifts it is the team dynamic.

Ant-Man And The Wasp - After the baggage-laden Infinity War, it's a breath of fresh air to get back to a Marvel film that's simpler and just plain fun. Ridiculously, this 20th MCU instalment is the first to have a female character sharing title space (Where's that Black Widow movie, Marvel?). Paul Rudd and Evangeline Lilly form a true double-act, teaming up to rescue Wasp's mother from the "quantum realm" while tangling with a pair of new villains (one intriguing, the other less so). There's plenty of comedy along the way, and the size-changing tricks are exploited for every laugh, stunt and ingenious trick that they're worth.

The Meg - Jason Statham vs. a giant, prehistoric shark. That about sums it up. I was expecting big, dumb, popcorn entertainment and it did not disappoint. Piling on the clichés with gleeful abandon - the hero dragged reluctantly out of retirement for one last mission, the estranged wife in danger, the unbelieving authorities, the amoral businessman endangering lives to exploit the monster for a quick buck, the supporting characters you just know are going to die - this is not a film that takes itself too seriously. Switch off your brain and enjoy!

BlacKKKlansman - This "Spike Lee joint" tells the if-it-wasn't-true-you'd-never-believe-it tale of Ron Stallworth (John David Washington), a black Colorado police officer who successfully infiltrates the Ku Klux Clan. His Jewish partner (Adam Driver) meets the Klan in person while Stallworth coordinates and speaks to them on the phone. Meanwhile, he grows closer to the local black rights activists, including student union leader Patrice (Laura Harrier). Lee gets the balance just right, between being funny and entertaining while having a serious underlying message. Although set in the 1970s, deliberate modern references remind us that race issues are still raw, and the fade-out to 2017 footage of Charlottesville leaves an uneasy feeling in the stomach...

The Children Act - More a TV drama than a movie, but a strong performance from Emma Thompson makes it a good one. She plays High Court judge, Fiona Maye, who has to rule on whether a 17-year-old Jehovah's Witness (Fionn Whitehead) should be given a life-saving blood transfusion against his parents' wishes. As she becomes drawn into the case, the teen develops a slightly creepy attachment to her. Meanwhile, her marriage to her unfaithful husband (Stanley Tucci) is breaking down. Based on an Ian McEwan novel, this is nothing special and doesn't grapple too hard with the moral questions it raises, but it's a decent slice of drama nonetheless.

Searching - A highly experimental film, in which David Kim (John Cho) searches for his missing teenage daughter, Margot (Michelle La), with the help of dedicated detective Rosemary Vick (Debra Messing). The gimmick is that every frame of the film is a view of a computer or smartphone screen, as the story unfolds through David's online searches, social media, video calls and news footage. It has to stretch credulity a few times to get certain scenes onto screens, but by and large it works. It's clever and, as with any good mystery, the real fun is to be gained from trying to unravel the clues for yourself and guess the twists before they happen.
rich_jacko: (River Tam XKCD)
I haven't been to the cinema as much of late. Partly because I've been busy, but also because the amount of choice at Cineworld gets worse and worse. There have been some films I've wanted to see that don't seem to have made it to Sheffield at all, not even to the Showroom. Still, there have been a few things I've seen over the past couple of months, and most of them have been worthwhile:

Mary and the Witch's Flower - It's not strictly a Ghibli film, but it might as well be. A beautiful old-school animation that feels like a cross between Harry Potter and Spirited Away. Mary moves to the countryside, where she discovers an old broomstick and a mysterious flower in the woods, which take her off to a school of magic. But there are sinister goings-on at the school, and soon she has to try to rescue her friend, Peter. I saw the subtitled version, so I can't vouch for the English dub, but Ghibli have a good record on this front. The story isn't hugely original, but it's full of charm and (as you'd expect) visually it's enchanting to look at. Plus cats.

Deadpool 2 - Deadpool basically has two tricks - being outrageous and lampshading tropes. Both of those can be funny, and if you liked the original, there's more of the same here. This time Deadpool (Ryan Reynolds) is facing off agajnst the time-travelling Cable (Josh Brolin, in his second Marvel villain role within a month). It has its moments, mainly when it manages to pull off completely unexpected gags, but they're sparse. Personally I'm a bit "meh" about the whole thing. They've sort of promised there won't be a third; I probably won't bother if there is.

Solo: A Star Wars Story - I saw this with a large group as part of my birthday celebrations, and our overall consensus was, "It was fine." That's not to be negative - It ticks all the boxes; it's a fun heist movie; and Alden Ehrenreich is believably a younger Han Solo. There's an impressive supporting cast, including Emilia Clarke, Woody Harrelson, Childish Gambino and Paul Bettany. It's just that something about it didn't quite feel like Star Wars. I don't know whether it was the gangster tone, the way everything was drab and cloudy, or something else. The sequel-friendly ending was also rather unsatisfying. The whole Kessel caper was a joy from start to finish though, and I loved L3, who was very much this film's K2-SO. Overall, it was no Rogue One though.

Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom - Owen (Chris Pratt), Claire (Bryce Dallas Howard) and Blue (Blue) are back for more dino action, with Jeff Goldblum filling in the "token original character" cameo. It's definitely a film of two halves: The first half of the film, on the island, with our heroes dodging dinos and molten lava, is garbage. The second half is... well... also garbage, but it is gloriously entertaining Hammer Horror garbage. Set in a gothic mansion and featuring a rooftop chase in a thunderstorm, a secret lab in the basement, dastardly villains, lots of creeping around in the dark, and more than a few "homages", it's a guilty pleasure.

Incredibles 2 - Another superhero movie that's more of the same, but when "the same" is a follow-up to possibility Pixar's best film, who's complaining? Picking up immediately where the first film left off (the Underminer!), our family of supers are still living in hiding from a world that sees superheroes as a public menace, until one of them gets an offer which seems too good to be true. This time it's Helen/Elastigirl, with Bob/Mr. Incredible being a stay-at-home dad. A lesser comedy would have massively played up the gender role-reversal angle, and had one or both parents fail miserably. This is much better. Both parents get some things right and some wrong. Both struggle to balance "work" and family. They disagree on some pretty fundamental things, but their relationship is still strong. All the original cast are back (Yes, including Edna!), along with new supers, and the set-pieces are still fast-paced and inventive. Special mention for Jack-Jack, for being a scene-stealing force of nature, whenever he appears!

The Secret of Marrowbone - I'm a sucker for Spanish horror, so this (English language) haunted house tale directed by Sergio G Sanchez drew me in. Jack (George MacKay) and his siblings flee to their mother's old family home to escape their violent father. But soon tragedy strikes and they must hide a secret. Youngest brother, Sam is terrified of a ghost in the house. All the mirrors remain hidden, and there's "blood money" in the grounds. Neighbour Allie (Anya Taylor-Joy) and lawyer Tom (Kyle Soller) become involved. The film uses all the haunted house tropes, and uses them well. And, like all good ghost stories, things aren't quite what they first appear to be...
rich_jacko: (Avatar)
Avengers: Infinity War is undeniably an impressive achievement. A "cinematic universe", built up over 18 previous films, all coming together. There's a lot of geeky joy to be had in watching so many characters, who we know so well, meeting and bouncing off each other. It is also, of course, spectacular, seemingly with a budget as big as its cast.

The big draw is obviously also the big challenge - Just how do you juggle a cast of 20+ superheroes without it being a complete mess? The most impressive thing about the film for me was that it succeeds in doing this. A 150-minute running time helps, as does keeping the plot very simple this time (Big Bad Thanos is trying to get hold of the six Infinity Stones. Our heroes are trying to stop him.).

Don't hope for too much. Infinity War is in no way a coherent film. It's more like three separate films with overlapping themes, which occasionally intertwine. But it's difficult to see how else they could manage it. It's predictable and at times fails to convey enough of a sense of danger. It's also a bit unsatisfying. Things are set up which we'll have to wait until the next film before they'll pay off. At times, it's a bit cavalier with killing characters off. Time may not allow for more, but we've grown fond of them and they deserve better. Another issue with bringing so many heroes together is that you can't avoid noticing just how many of them are middle-aged white guys (even with two of the MAWGs only mentioned in passing as Not Appearing In This Film). Speaking as a MAWG, I think I can get away with saying, "But they all look the same!"

Thank heaven then, for the Guardians of the Galaxy, who are always a joy. I didn't expect them to have more than a cameo, so I was very pleasantly surprised to find them having more screen time and driving more of the plot than just about anyone else. (Although damn you, Quill, for a comment about Thanos that I cannot unsee!) The Guardians, together with Thanos, Thor, Doctor Strange, Vision and Scarlet Witch, are the main driving forces here, with everyone else playing the parts of backup or sidekicks. It's great to spend more time with the slightly lesser-known cast, although (let's face it) in a film like this, there's never going to be that much room for character development.

No, it's all about the action. That action is pretty relentless, from the opening scene to the closing moments. Fight scene after fight scene, but there's enough variety and ingenuity that it never gets boring. Best of all, it manages the balance of comedy, adrenaline and drama perfectly (something Thor: Ragnarok misjudged somewhat). You laugh when you are meant to laugh. You care when you are meant to care. You want to fist-pump the air and cheer at just the right times, which are many and often.

It's an Event Movie - no more, no less. Do not expect a genre-defining masterpiece, but do expect a whole lot of fun.

Profile

rich_jacko: (Default)
rich_jacko

September 2024

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
29 30     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 28th, 2025 10:49 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios